Resolution CM/ResDH(2026)115
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Străisteanu against the Republic of Moldova
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 3 June 2026
at the 1562nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
9989/20
STRĂISTEANU
05/06/2025
05/09/2025
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established on account of the domestic courts’ failure to strike a fair balance between competing rights in the context of a debate on a matter of public interest (violation of Article 10 of the Convention);
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgment, and noting that no award of just satisfaction was made by the Court in the present case and indicating that the applicant did not avail of her right to reopen the domestic proceedings (see document DH-DD(2026)376); Noting with interest the general measures adopted notably the unification of judicial practice, trainings for judges and the circulation of the Court’s case-law regarding Article 10;
Having satisfied that the general measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case.
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.