Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)123
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Eight cases against Latvia
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 April 2017 at the 1284th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
66820/01
SVIPSTA
09/03/2006
09/06/2006
69458/01
GASINS
19/04/2011
19/07/2011
71071/01
CERNIKOVS
31/05/2011
31/05/2011
65025/01
BIRZNIEKS
31/05/2011
31/08/2011
14749/03
KARNEJEVS
05/07/2011
05/10/2011
71092/01
ZANDBERGS
20/12/2011
20/03/2011
46413/10
MIĶELSONS
03/11/2015
03/02/2016
36064/07
KIRŠTEINS
20/10/2016
20/10/2016
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2017)305);
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy