Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)394
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Six cases against Hungary
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 December 2022
at the 1452nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
30385/07
SZERDAHELYI
17/01/2012
17/04/2012
7871/10
KÖRTVÉLYESSY
05/04/2016
05/07/2016
20497/13
TÓTH
26/05/2020
26/05/2020
27585/13
UNITED CIVIL AVIATION TRADE UNION AND CSORBA
22/05/2018
22/08/2018
31573/14
PÓKA
06/10/2020
06/10/2020
58271/15
KÖRTVÉLYESSY (No. 2)
18/07/2017
13/11/2017
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the authorities’ unjustified interference with the applicants’ right to freedom of assembly (Article 11);
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the information provided by the government as regards the individual measures in these cases (see DH-DD(2022)1291), noted that the just satisfaction, where awarded, was paid by the government of the respondent State and that no further individual measures are possible in these cases;
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Patyi and Others v. Hungary group of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.