SECOND SECTION
CASE OF TANYAŞ AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE
(Applications nos. 36167/18 and 239 others)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
12 November 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Tanyaş and Others v. Türkiye,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Pauliine Koskelo, President,
Lorraine Schembri Orland,
Frédéric Krenc, judges,
and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to:
the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the applicants listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein;
the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article 5 of the Convention concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion regarding the commission of an offence, the alleged lack of relevant and sufficient reasons when ordering and extending the pre-trial detention, the length of pre-trial detention, the ineffectiveness of the judicial review of the lawfulness of detention and the absence of a remedy to obtain compensation to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), represented by their then Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, former Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the applications;
the parties’ observations;
the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;
Having deliberated in private on 15 October 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
1. The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (for further background information see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 3-9 and §§ 106-07, 20 July 2021).
2. On various dates, the applicants were arrested and placed in pre-trial detention, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, § 58, 3 March 2020). The detention orders relied principally on the nature of the alleged offence, the state of the evidence and the potential sentence. It was also noted that investigations into the coup attempt were being conducted across the country, that statements had not yet been taken from all the suspects and that the alleged offence was among the “catalogue” offences listed in Article 100 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) (for the text of Article 100 of the CCP, as relevant, see Baş, cited above, § 61). It appears from the initial detention orders and the documents available in the case files that the majority of the applicants were identified as users of the ByLock messaging system. Moreover, some of the applicants were suspected of being affiliated with the FETÖ/PDY based on witness statements, or of financing the FETÖ/PDY in view of their use of accounts in Bank Asya – a bank allegedly linked to FETÖ/PDY –, possession of pro-FETÖ/PDY publications and/or United States one-dollar bills with an “F” serial number (denoting the initial of the forename “Fetullah”), and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. It further appears from the Government’s submissions that the detention orders of some applicants were based on their suspension or removal from their positions as judges or prosecutors by the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors (Hakimler ve Savcılar Yüksek Kurulu – “the HSYK”) due to their suspected membership of the FETÖ/PDY. The challenges brought by the applicants against their detention, including by reason of the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion of having committed the offence imputed to them, were dismissed, including by the Constitutional Court.
3. According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts. It appears that, in some of the applications, the criminal proceedings are still pending before appeal courts or the Constitutional Court.
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS4. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION5. The applicants complained that there had been no specific evidence giving rise to a reasonable suspicion, within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention, that they had committed a criminal offence necessitating, in particular, their initial pre-trial detention.
6. The Government urged the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible in respect of the applicants who had not made use of the compensatory remedy under Article 141 of the CCP, or whose compensation claims were still pending. They further asked the Court to declare the applications inadmissible for abuse of the right of application to the extent that the applicants had not informed the Court of the developments in their cases following the lodging of their applications.
7. The Court notes that similar objections have already been dismissed in other cases against Türkiye (see, for instance, Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, §§ 118-21, 3 March 2020, and Turan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 57-64, 23 November 2021), and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.
8. The Court notes that, when ordering the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, the magistrate’s courts sought to justify their decisions by making a general reference to Article 100 of the CCP and the potential sentence, as well as to “the evidence in the file”. However, in doing so, they simply cited the wording of the provision in question, without actually specifying what the evidence in question entailed and why it constituted a reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offence in question. The Court refers in this connection to its findings in the judgment of Baş (cited above, §§ 190‑95), according to which the vague and general references to the wording of Article 100 of the CCP and to the evidence in the file cannot be regarded as sufficient to justify the “reasonableness” of the suspicion on which the applicants’ detention was supposed to have been based, in the absence either of a specific assessment of the individual items of evidence in the file, or of any information available in the file at the material time that could have justified the suspicion against the applicants, or of any other kinds of verifiable material or facts.
9. The Court further notes that the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention orders were mainly based on information indicating their use of the ByLock messaging system, banking activities considered as financing the FETÖ/PDY, subscriptions to certain pro-FETÖ/PDY publications, having in their possessions United States one‑dollar bills with an “F” serial number, and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. To the extent that the detention orders have taken into account the applicants’ alleged use of the ByLock messaging system, the Court notes that it has already found that the use of ByLock alone was not of a nature to constitute “reasonable suspicion” within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) in respect of the offence attributed to the applicants (see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 151-85, 20 July 2021, and Taner Kılıç v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 208/18, §§ 102-03 and 106-09, 31 May 2022). The Court also notes that as regards some of the applicants, the Government have referred to the existence of witness statements justifying the measures in question. It observes, however, that there are no statements in the case files referring to concrete and specific facts that may have given rise to a reasonable suspicion against the applicants concerned at the material time. The Court further considers, as relevant, that the other acts imputed to the applicants (see paragraph 2 above) were merely circumstantial elements which, in the absence of any other information capable of justifying the suspicions in question, benefited from the presumption of legality and cannot reasonably be regarded as constituting a body of evidence demonstrating the applicants’ membership of a terrorist organisation (compare Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 104-05 and the cases cited therein).
10. The Court also observes from the information in the case files that some of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention was based on the decisions taken by the HSYK to suspend or remove them from office. The Court has already found that such decisions were not of a nature to constitute “reasonable suspicion” within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) in respect of the offence attributed to them (see Baş, cited above, §§ 170-195).
11. Since the Government have not provided any other indications, “facts” or “information” capable of satisfying it that the applicants were “reasonably suspected”, at the time of their initial detention, of having committed the alleged offence, the Court finds that the requirements of Article 5 § 1 (c) regarding the “reasonableness” of a suspicion justifying detention have not been satisfied (see Baş, cited above, § 195, and Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 114-16). It finally considers that while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt – that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (compare Baş, cited above, §§ 115-16 and §§ 196‑201). It therefore concludes that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.
OTHER COMPLAINTS12. As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98).
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
13. The applicants, except for the applicants in applications nos. 38532/19, 42022/19, 44066/19, 47075/19, 53060/19 and 53333/19, requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non‑pecuniary damage within the time-limit allotted. Most of the applicants in question also claimed pecuniary damage, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.
14. The Government contested the applicants’ claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.
15. For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102‑07), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 38532/19, 42022/19, 44066/19, 47075/19, 53060/19 and 53333/19, a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Declares the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence, admissible;Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence;Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints under Article 5 of the Convention;Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 38532/19, 42022/19, 44066/19, 47075/19, 53060/19 and 53333/19, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on this amount, which is to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
Dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction.Done in English, and notified in writing on 12 November 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Dorothee von Arnim Pauliine Koskelo
Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of cases:
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant
Year of Birth
Place of Residence
Nationality
Represented by
36167/18
Tanyaş v. Türkiye
25/07/2018
Levent TANYAŞ
1975
Turkish
Adem UZAK
36646/18
Deveci v. Türkiye
13/07/2018
Uçar DEVECİ
1970
Kırıkkale
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
36651/18
Ünsal v. Türkiye
13/07/2018
Samet ÜNSAL
1970
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
36652/18
Daylan v. Türkiye
13/07/2018
Erkan DAYLAN
1993
Balıkesir
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
36653/18
Şahin v. Türkiye
13/07/2018
Servet ŞAHİN
1965
Aksaray
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
36654/18
Çakmak v. Türkiye
13/07/2018
Numan ÇAKMAK
1990
Erzurum
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
36655/18
Karaca v. Türkiye
13/07/2018
Sefa KARACA
1983
Burdur
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
6158/19
Aksu v. Türkiye
17/12/2018
Tahsin AKSU
1972
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
14259/19
Kıldan v. Türkiye
04/03/2019
Abdullah Oğuzhan KILDAN
Kastamonu
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
16020/19
Ercan v. Türkiye
01/03/2019
Hakan ERCAN
1974
Konya
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
16036/19
Aygün v. Türkiye
01/03/2019
Ramazan AYGÜN
1972
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
16043/19
Bolat v. Türkiye
01/03/2019
Bahadır BOLAT
1989
Bitlis
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
16583/19
Karapınar v. Türkiye
20/03/2019
Nurullah KARAPINAR
1989
Sakarya
Turkish
Adem UZAK
18485/19
Boz v. Türkiye
22/03/2019
Bülent BOZ
1989
Kahramanmaraş
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
18933/19
Bıyık v. Türkiye
22/03/2019
Özay BIYIK
1984
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
19536/19
Cebeci v. Türkiye
20/03/2019
Şenol CEBECİ
1975
Istanbul
Turkish
Adem UZAK
22457/19
Topal v. Türkiye
12/04/2019
Gazi TOPAL
1982
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
22459/19
Buldu v. Türkiye
12/04/2019
Ahmet BULDU
1989
Bitlis
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
23366/19
Kılıç v. Türkiye
12/04/2019
Yavuz KILIÇ
1986
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
27176/19
Yiğit v. Türkiye
03/05/2019
Songül YİĞİT
1974
Zonguldak
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
27186/19
Yıldırım v. Türkiye
03/05/2019
Mehmet YILDIRIM
1974
Çankırı
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
33902/19
Sezer v. Türkiye
28/05/2019
Nuri SEZER
1983
Ardahan
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
33907/19
Akarsu v. Türkiye
28/05/2019
Cevdet AKARSU
1975
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
33910/19
Çiçek v. Türkiye
28/05/2019
Ramazan ÇİÇEK
1977
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
33918/19
Bozkurt v. Türkiye
23/05/2019
Ahmet BOZKURT
1971
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
33922/19
Akgül v. Türkiye
23/05/2019
Turgay AKGÜL
1979
Bitlis
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
33925/19
Bıyık v. Türkiye
22/05/2019
Yavuz BIYIK
1974
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
35951/19
Akyüz v. Türkiye
25/06/2019
İsa AKYÜZ
1979
Kocaeli
Turkish
36034/19
Adanur v. Türkiye
20/06/2019
Salim ADANUR
1978
Trabzon
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
36036/19
Dokumacı v. Türkiye
25/06/2019
Fikret DOKUMACI
1959
Trabzon
Turkish
36193/19
Zeriğ v. Türkiye
13/06/2019
Ahmet ZERİĞ
1960
İzmir
Turkish
Seçkin KESKİN
36250/19
Kurtulmuş v. Türkiye
12/06/2019
Necati KURTULMUŞ
1982
Manisa
Turkish
Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY
36280/19
Büyükyavuz v. Türkiye
21/06/2019
Ahmet Hulusi BÜYÜKYAVUZ
1986
Konya
Turkish
Halil İbrahim KEBEŞOĞLU
36436/19
Yıldız v. Türkiye
24/06/2019
Şehadet YILDIZ
1976
Sakarya
Turkish
Agit FİDAN
36527/19
Çakıcı v. Türkiye
18/06/2019
Durmuş ÇAKICI
1982
Bursa
Turkish
Kamile KILDAN
36565/19
Doğan v. Türkiye
25/06/2019
Bünyamin DOĞAN
1974
Kayseri
Turkish
Halime DOĞAN
36720/19
Çizmeci v. Türkiye
03/07/2019
Ersan ÇİZMECİ
1987
Manisa
Turkish
Mehmet MİRZA
37057/19
Dızman v. Türkiye
21/06/2019
Gökhan DIZMAN
1982
Aydın
Turkish
37244/19
Yılmaz v. Türkiye
28/06/2019
Kenan YILMAZ
1981
Sakarya
Turkish
37274/19
Aymaz v. Türkiye
04/07/2019
Muhammet Bekir AYMAZ
1990
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN
37369/19
Özcan v. Türkiye
05/07/2019
Ömer ÖZCAN
1978
Ankara
Turkish
37970/19
Özkaya v. Türkiye
19/06/2019
Ahmet ÖZKAYA
1991
Eskişehir
Turkish
Ulviye Özge CAZ ÖZKAYA
38326/19
Özer v. Türkiye
11/07/2019
Barış ÖZER
1974
Elazığ
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
38530/19
Aygün v. Türkiye
04/07/2019
İmdat AYGÜN
1980
Antalya
Turkish
Ebubekir RENK
38532/19
Arslan v. Türkiye
12/07/2019
Levent ARSLAN
1976
Ankara
Turkish
38548/19
But v. Türkiye
08/07/2019
Halit BUT
1974
Istanbul
Turkish
Ercan KARACA
38674/19
Sağbaş v. Türkiye
08/07/2019
Emrah SAĞBAŞ
1987
Istanbul
Turkish
Esra Nur AKYOL
39000/19
Güneş v. Türkiye
08/07/2019
Ökkeş GÜNEŞ
1994
Kahramanmaraş
Turkish
39010/19
Kocagöz v. Türkiye
10/07/2019
Avni KOCAGÖZ
1969
Aydın
Turkish
Esra Nur AKYOL
39320/19
Gülmez v. Türkiye
12/07/2019
Ramazan GÜLMEZ
1974
Samsun
Turkish
Recep ALTUN
39674/19
Sağlam v. Türkiye
19/06/2019
Musa SAĞLAM
1972
Ankara
Turkish
Melike Büşra URAL
39730/19
Öztürk v. Türkiye
30/05/2019
Osman ÖZTÜRK
1982
Istanbul
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
40121/19
Alp v. Türkiye
19/07/2019
Ali ALP
1977
İzmir
Turkish
40196/19
Şen v. Türkiye
11/07/2019
Murat ŞEN
1968
Kayseri
Turkish
Serra ŞEN
40269/19
Dönmez v. Türkiye
18/07/2019
Oktay DÖNMEZ
1986
Balıkesir
Turkish
40891/19
Sert v. Türkiye
17/07/2019
Metin SERT
1986
Mersin
Turkish
Mehmet ÜNLÜ
40937/19
Karka v. Türkiye
22/07/2019
İlhan KARKA
1979
Ankara
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
41070/19
Pulgak v. Türkiye
24/07/2019
Abdullah PULGAK
1990
See REP address
Turkish
Adem UZAK
41107/19
Eken v. Türkiye
23/07/2019
Eyüp EKEN
1984
Konya
Turkish
Muhammed Talha YILMAZ
41330/19
Ulukuş v. Türkiye
23/07/2019
Kanuni Süleyman ULUKUŞ
1976
Ankara
Turkish
41420/19
Akdemir v. Türkiye
24/07/2019
İdris AKDEMİR
1985
Muş
Turkish
41790/19
Barlık v. Türkiye
26/07/2019
Şahin BARLIK
1991
Manisa
Turkish
Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY
41819/19
Gider v. Türkiye
02/08/2019
Özgür GİDER
1974
Samsun
Turkish
Serap ÇAKIR
41823/19
Kanbur v. Türkiye
26/07/2019
Sami KANBUR
1959
Düzce
Turkish
Mehmet YALÇIN
41838/19
Demir v. Türkiye
30/07/2019
Ali DEMİR
1975
Ordu
Turkish
42006/19
Şaştı v. Türkiye
29/07/2019
Bünyamin ŞAŞTI
1976
Sakarya
Turkish
Enes Malik KILIÇ
42022/19
Hacıoğlu v. Türkiye
05/07/2019
Osman HACIOĞLU
1973
Rize
Turkish
42027/19
Suna v. Türkiye
27/06/2019
İsmail SUNA
1986
Denizli
Turkish
42101/19
Yıldız v. Türkiye
30/07/2019
Veysel YILDIZ
1977
Ankara
Turkish
Cengiz YILMAZ
42535/19
Karaduman v. Türkiye
01/08/2019
Ümit KARADUMAN
1987
Tekirdağ
Turkish
Zeynep Rana EKİNCİ KOÇ
42537/19
Yücel v. Türkiye
31/07/2019
Mustafa YÜCEL
1983
Ankara
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
42601/19
Bal v. Türkiye
01/08/2019
Halil BAL
1969
İzmir
Turkish
Memduh Remzi BAL
43027/19
İpek v. Türkiye
01/08/2019
Cihat İPEK
1989
Trabzon
Turkish
Bilal İPEK
43166/19
Andıç v. Türkiye
05/08/2019
Mehmet Ali ANDIÇ
1985
Hatay
Turkish
43248/19
Cengiz v. Türkiye
07/08/2019
Filiz CENGİZ
1982
Istanbul
Turkish
Adem UZAK
43293/19
Günaydın v. Türkiye
02/08/2019
Ahmet GÜNAYDIN
1968
Samsun
Turkish
Büşra POLAT DURAN
44066/19
Şen v. Türkiye
07/08/2019
Mustafa Emre ŞEN
1988
İzmir
Turkish
44070/19
Dönmez v. Türkiye
07/08/2019
Murat DÖNMEZ
1975
Yozgat
Turkish
Üsame İNAN
44082/19
Kızıltoprak v. Türkiye
09/08/2019
Yusuf KIZILTOPRAK
1990
Düzce
Turkish
Bekir DÖNMEZ
44124/19
Vardal v. Türkiye
07/08/2019
Fahri VARDAL
1974
İzmir
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
44297/19
Sevilmiş v. Türkiye
07/08/2019
Halit SEVİLMİŞ
1983
Istanbul
Turkish
Mücahit AYDIN
44318/19
Aydın v. Türkiye
06/08/2019
Şerif AYDIN
1981
Şanlıurfa
Turkish
Mehmet AY
44335/19
Şahin v. Türkiye
09/08/2019
Mustafa ŞAHİN
1991
Gaziantep
Turkish
44407/19
Polat v. Türkiye
07/08/2019
Selçuk POLAT
1982
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
44468/19
Çora v. Türkiye
21/08/2019
Yüksel ÇORA
1977
Istanbul
Turkish
Fatma ÇORA
44525/19
Şentürk v. Türkiye
06/08/2019
Şahin ŞENTÜRK
1976
Çorum
Turkish
Ayşe ŞENTÜRK
44702/19
Köse v. Türkiye
08/08/2019
Emin KÖSE
1968
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
Ayşe Dudu KÖSE
45538/19
Damarseçkin v. Türkiye
27/08/2019
Müjdat DAMARSEÇKİN
1988
Istanbul
Turkish
Adem UZAK
45675/19
Vardi v. Türkiye
15/08/2019
Ömer VARDİ
1984
Istanbul
Turkish
Şeyma ALKAN
45678/19
Mercan v. Türkiye
15/08/2019
Bayram Ali MERCAN
1988
Adana
Turkish
Mücahit AYDIN
45838/19
Fesli v. Türkiye
15/08/2019
Muhammed Hamza FESLİ
1992
Mersin
Turkish
Mehmet Fatih ARSLAN
46370/19
Köken v. Türkiye
06/08/2019
Reşit KÖKEN
1973
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
46765/19
Birlik v. Türkiye
22/08/2019
Eshat BİRLİK
1982
Bursa
Turkish
Cihad KAVUT
46791/19
Dursun v. Türkiye
22/08/2019
Zekeriya DURSUN
1975
Karabük
Turkish
Lale KARADAŞ
47003/19
Aksoy v. Türkiye
23/08/2019
Sinan AKSOY
1978
Amasya
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
47018/19
Akdemir v. Türkiye
22/08/2019
Ahmet AKDEMİR
1981
Istanbul
Turkish
47066/19
Tek v. Türkiye
21/08/2019
Davut TEK
1983
Kayseri
Turkish
Melek AYDIN İSLAMOĞLU
47075/19
Özgür v. Türkiye
26/08/2019
Veysel ÖZGÜR
1967
Ankara
Turkish
47276/19
Alkan v. Türkiye
20/08/2019
Osman ALKAN
1976
Aksaray
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
47281/19
Avcı v. Türkiye
26/08/2019
Ali AVCI
1983
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
47689/19
Mıhçı v. Türkiye
23/08/2019
Özgür MIHÇI
1975
İzmir
Turkish
Burcu HAS
47854/19
Solak v. Türkiye
20/08/2019
Ahmet SOLAK
1990
Osmaniye
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
47861/19
Göyce v. Türkiye
01/07/2019
Mustafa GÖYCE
1983
Hatay
Turkish
Dudu ERTUNÇ
49038/19
Dede v. Türkiye
06/09/2019
Salih DEDE
1973
Manisa
Turkish
Havva ALAN ÖZCEL
49412/19
Boğaz v. Türkiye
10/09/2019
Hasan BOĞAZ
1987
Karaman
Turkish
Nurhan ÖZDURAN
49487/19
Keklik v. Türkiye
05/09/2019
Adem KEKLİK
1988
Adıyaman
Turkish
50066/19
Uzkut v. Türkiye
10/09/2019
Mehmet UZKUT
1966
İzmir
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
50227/19
İslam v. Türkiye
11/09/2019
Ahmet İSLAM
1984
Aksaray
Turkish
50698/19
Ölçer v. Türkiye
05/09/2019
Nihat ÖLÇER
1982
Haarlem
Turkish
Ebubekir RENK
50753/19
Acemli v. Türkiye
02/09/2019
Ali ACEMLİ
1963
Kocaeli
Turkish
Şerif FİDAN
50809/19
Odabaşı v. Türkiye
05/09/2019
Mehmet ODABAŞI
1973
Karabük
Turkish
51084/19
Şahin v. Türkiye
02/09/2019
Hakan ŞAHİN
1988
Manisa
Turkish
Eyyüp SAĞIR
51121/19
Ulaş v. Türkiye
12/09/2019
Hilal ULAŞ
1993
Kocaeli
Turkish
Adem UZAK
51142/19
Önemli v. Türkiye
11/09/2019
Cihan ÖNEMLİ
1983
Manisa
Turkish
Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY
51151/19
Cesur v. Türkiye
05/09/2019
Ramazan CESUR
1985
Karabük
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
51305/19
Kızmaz v. Türkiye
04/09/2019
Ümit KIZMAZ
1987
Konya
Turkish
51398/19
Çay v. Türkiye
13/09/2019
Hasan ÇAY
1971
Konya
Turkish
Emre ÇAY
51483/19
Telli v. Türkiye
06/09/2019
İrfan TELLİ
1969
Çorum
Turkish
Ebubekir RENK
51499/19
Göğüş v. Türkiye
20/09/2019
Ferudun GÖĞÜŞ
1988
Istanbul
Turkish
51582/19
Ekici v. Türkiye
15/10/2019
Erhan EKİCİ
1987
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet Ertuğrul TÜTÜNCÜ
51646/19
Köprülü v. Türkiye
10/09/2019
Onur Murat KÖPRÜLÜ
1978
Karabük
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
51676/19
Karabulut v. Türkiye
19/09/2019
Samet KARABULUT
1989
Kayseri
Turkish
Filiz KARABULUT
51818/19
Kızılırmak v. Türkiye
12/09/2019
Yüksel KIZILIRMAK
1989
Osmaniye
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
52225/19
Yıldız v. Türkiye
16/09/2019
Mehmet Fatih YILDIZ
1986
Nevşehir
Turkish
Özcan AKINCI
52470/19
Yeşil v. Türkiye
27/09/2019
Yaşar YEŞİL
1968
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
52475/19
Ağraş v. Türkiye
23/09/2019
Ahmet AĞRAŞ
1988
İzmir
Turkish
52553/19
Özbey v. Türkiye
24/09/2019
Rahmi ÖZBEY
1957
Ankara
Turkish
Büşra DEMİRCİ
52601/19
Tuner v. Türkiye
20/09/2019
Bünyamin TUNER
1976
Ankara
Turkish
Ahu TUNER
52612/19
Aytunç v. Türkiye
23/09/2019
Ömer Faruk AYTUNÇ
1988
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
52699/19
Cingöz v. Türkiye
22/08/2019
Seyit CİNGÖZ
1974
Trabzon
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
53053/19
Eylek v. Türkiye
01/10/2019
Halil İbrahim EYLEK
1995
Adana
Turkish
53060/19
Köse v. Türkiye
24/09/2019
Mehmet Ali KÖSE
1976
Isparta
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
53103/19
Erdoğmuş v. Türkiye
01/10/2019
Harun ERDOĞMUŞ
1986
Çorum
Turkish
Ebubekir RENK
53308/19
Korkmaz v. Türkiye
20/09/2019
Barış KORKMAZ
1988
Konya
Turkish
Leyla MESUTOĞLU
53333/19
Güvercin v. Türkiye
11/09/2019
Hafit GÜVERCİN
1987
Elazığ
Turkish
İsmail GÜVERCİN
53351/19
Türkmen v. Türkiye
19/09/2019
Mustafa TÜRKMEN
1975
Karabük
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
53369/19
Soy v. Türkiye
17/09/2019
Enes İbrahim SOY
1991
Bartın
Turkish
Ebubekir RENK
53524/19
Koçak v. Türkiye
23/09/2019
Nadir KOÇAK
1975
Istanbul
Turkish
53764/19
Tuncel v. Türkiye
23/09/2019
Tuğrul TUNCEL
1970
Niğde
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
54386/19
Akgün v. Türkiye
26/09/2019
İbrahim AKGÜN
1973
İzmir
Turkish
54501/19
Demir v. Türkiye
03/10/2019
İmdat DEMİR
1984
Istanbul
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
54525/19
Kurt v. Türkiye
04/10/2019
Numan KURT
1991
Malatya
Turkish
Erdal ÇELİK
54885/19
Alparslan v. Türkiye
27/08/2019
Ali ALPARSLAN
1988
Konya
Turkish
Nurhan ÖZDURAN
55590/19
Zorlu v. Türkiye
05/09/2019
Turgut ZORLU
1983
Giresun
Turkish
55778/19
Öndem v. Türkiye
25/09/2019
Aliaddin ÖNDEM
1966
İzmir
Turkish
Hatice ATMAZ DERİNCE
55822/19
Kurt v. Türkiye
03/09/2019
Ali KURT
1984
Isparta
Turkish
Zülal BÜKER
55875/19
Yılmaz v. Türkiye
11/10/2019
Kerem YILMAZ
1987
Kocaeli
Turkish
Esma YILMAZ
55949/19
Duran v. Türkiye
09/10/2019
Abdullah DURAN
1979
Istanbul
Turkish
55953/19
Kıpçak v. Türkiye
08/10/2019
Barış KIPÇAK
1981
Konya
Turkish
Sultan KIPÇAK
56055/19
Tuz v. Türkiye
09/10/2019
Alpaslan TUZ
1977
Denizli
Turkish
Nurten TUZ
56063/19
Başer v. Türkiye
10/10/2019
Cemil BAŞER
1988
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
Hamide Nur ALKAÇ
56071/19
Sağlam v. Türkiye
09/10/2019
Abdullah SAĞLAM
1984
Bolu
Turkish
Şeyma ALKAN
56253/19
Arslan v. Türkiye
24/10/2019
Abdullah ARSLAN
1991
İstanbul
Turkish
Adem UZAK
56261/19
Deliktaş v. Türkiye
23/10/2019
Ramazan DELİKTAŞ
1974
Karabük
Turkish
Adem UZAK
57778/19
Kara v. Türkiye
04/11/2019
Mehmet KARA
1987
Istanbul
Turkish
Adem UZAK
59158/19
Erol v. Türkiye
11/11/2019
Hasan EROL
1979
Karabük
Turkish
Adem UZAK
59162/19
Akar v. Türkiye
11/11/2019
Avni AKAR
1982
Kahramanmaraş
Turkish
Adem UZAK
59165/19
Beyazdağ v. Türkiye
11/11/2019
Yakup BEYAZDAĞ
1991
Istanbul
Turkish
Adem UZAK
60006/19
Yalçın v. Türkiye
09/09/2019
Abdusamet YALÇIN
1985
Tekirdağ
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
62825/19
Kanbur v. Türkiye
22/11/2019
İlhami KANBUR
1983
Ankara
Turkish
Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN
63004/19
Erkan v. Türkiye
18/11/2019
Suna ERKAN
1982
Kırklareli
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
97/20
Çağlı v. Türkiye
09/12/2019
Abdullah Çağatay ÇAĞLI
1981
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
276/20
Beygo v. Türkiye
19/12/2019
Hasan Ergün BEYGO
1981
Balıkesir
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
514/20
Bayçöl v. Türkiye
10/12/2019
Figen BAYÇÖL
1972
Bolu
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
1135/20
Oğuz v. Türkiye
12/12/2019
Hasan OĞUZ
1965
Balıkesir
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
1199/20
Tozlu v. Türkiye
27/11/2019
Mustafa Ali TOZLU
1975
Manisa
Turkish
Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY
2487/20
Kaya v. Türkiye
24/12/2019
Metin KAYA
1972
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
2754/20
Aydın v. Türkiye
17/12/2019
Ahmet AYDIN
1987
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
4197/20
Sevim v. Türkiye
07/01/2020
Mehmet SEVİM
1973
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
4394/20
Kara v. Türkiye
06/01/2020
Mustafa KARA
1986
Tekirdağ
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
5498/20
Altınbaş v. Türkiye
13/01/2020
Ufuk ALTINBAŞ
1977
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
5980/20
Akar v. Türkiye
08/01/2020
Fatih AKAR
1979
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
7152/20
Kılıç v. Türkiye
13/01/2020
Yaşar KILIÇ
1973
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
7346/20
Arslan v. Türkiye
20/01/2020
Halil İbrahim ARSLAN
1987
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
9289/20
Özkan v. Türkiye
30/01/2020
Cihan ÖZKAN
1983
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
11485/20
Ocak v. Türkiye
03/02/2020
Mehmet Zahit OCAK
1950
Manisa
Turkish
Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY
14837/20
Ekinci v. Türkiye
10/03/2020
Yasin EKİNCİ
1989
Kocaeli
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
15016/20
Tunçdemir v. Türkiye
26/02/2020
Derviş TUNÇDEMİR
1979
Ankara
Turkish
Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN
16028/20
Dal v. Türkiye
20/03/2020
Arif DAL
1985
Manisa
Turkish
Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY
16390/20
Durak v. Türkiye
20/03/2020
Hüseyin DURAK
1984
Manisa
Turkish
Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY
17625/20
Gündem v. Türkiye
25/03/2020
Ahmet GÜNDEM
1994
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
20189/20
Arabacı v. Türkiye
14/05/2020
Murat ARABACI
1971
Istanbul
Turkish
Adem UZAK
20199/20
Yüksel v. Türkiye
14/05/2020
Neyfel YÜKSEL
1991
Karabük
Turkish
Adem UZAK
20849/20
Özcan v. Türkiye
13/02/2020
Abdullah Himmet ÖZCAN
1985
Kocaeli
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
21264/20
Türker v. Türkiye
15/05/2020
Türker TÜRKER
1973
Ankara
Turkish
Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN
21710/20
Kaşağıcı v. Türkiye
08/05/2020
Hamdi KAŞAĞICI
1986
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
24036/20
Budak v. Türkiye
08/05/2020
Ali İhsan BUDAK
1984
Kocaeli
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
24076/20
Girgin v. Türkiye
22/05/2020
Irmak GİRGİN
1986
Bursa
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
24378/20
Türk v. Türkiye
22/05/2020
Yusuf TÜRK
1976
Niğde
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
26375/20
Irmak v. Türkiye
19/06/2020
İsmail IRMAK
1985
Bursa
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
26420/20
Gökçe v. Türkiye
19/06/2020
İbrahim GÖKÇE
1981
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
26564/20
Yumuşak v. Türkiye
08/06/2020
Hacı İbrahim YUMUŞAK
1975
Manisa
Turkish
Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY
27441/20
Çelik v. Türkiye
29/06/2020
Ersan ÇELİK
1978
Muğla
Turkish
Adem UZAK
28170/20
Güzeldal v. Türkiye
18/06/2020
Metin GÜZELDAL
1980
Manisa
Turkish
Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY
28783/20
Karabıyık v. Türkiye
24/06/2020
Metin KARABIYIK
1975
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
30515/20
Atalay v. Türkiye
01/07/2020
Ramazan ATALAY
1969
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
30740/20
Fırat v. Türkiye
26/06/2020
Halil İbrahim FIRAT
1984
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
31639/20
Sarı v. Türkiye
09/07/2020
Serkan SARI
1984
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
31669/20
Sünger v. Türkiye
09/07/2020
Özcan SÜNGER
1974
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
33006/20
Tekin v. Türkiye
24/07/2020
Ertuğrul TEKİN
1987
Manisa
Turkish
Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY
36114/20
Yıldız v. Türkiye
14/08/2020
Mehmet YILDIZ
1976
Ordu
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
36196/20
Tana v. Türkiye
14/08/2020
Erdem TANA
1984
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
40620/20
Karaoğlu v. Türkiye
01/09/2020
Ruhi KARAOĞLU
1974
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
41450/20
Şahin v. Türkiye
01/09/2020
Ali Kemal ŞAHİN
1966
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
42218/20
Çerkez v. Türkiye
04/09/2020
Kerim ÇERKEZ
1988
Ankara
Turkish
Adem KAPLAN
42397/20
Sert v. Türkiye
11/09/2020
Alper SERT
1974
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
43529/20
Gönül v. Türkiye
29/09/2020
Ertuğrul GÖNÜL
1989
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
43558/20
Gülüm v. Türkiye
29/09/2020
Mustafa GÜLÜM
1978
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
43561/20
Babaarslan v. Türkiye
29/09/2020
Recep BABAARSLAN
1976
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
43571/20
Tüccar v. Türkiye
21/09/2020
İsa TÜCCAR
1968
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
43594/20
Sönmez v. Türkiye
29/09/2020
Sultan SÖNMEZ
1987
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
43662/20
Arslan v. Türkiye
21/09/2020
Miray ARSLAN
1992
Kayseri
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
45074/20
Baloğlu v. Türkiye
07/10/2020
Remziye BALOĞLU
1978
İzmit
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
46052/20
Önal v. Türkiye
13/10/2020
İsmail ÖNAL
1983
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
46056/20
Meme v. Türkiye
13/10/2020
Mehmet MEME
1988
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
46057/20
Manav v. Türkiye
13/10/2020
Yunus MANAV
1991
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
46215/20
Dere v. Türkiye
14/10/2020
Hamit DERE
1989
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
46216/20
Alp v. Türkiye
14/10/2020
Aziz ALP
1987
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
46218/20
Altun v. Türkiye
14/10/2020
Mustafa ALTUN
1980
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
46367/20
Satıcı v. Türkiye
14/10/2020
Cemil SATICI
1994
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
46696/20
Şahin v. Türkiye
15/10/2020
Niyazi ŞAHİN
1982
Giresun
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
46697/20
Polat v. Türkiye
15/10/2020
Şeref POLAT
1966
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
46698/20
Tanat v. Türkiye
15/10/2020
Beytullah TANAT
1971
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
46699/20
Şahin v. Türkiye
15/10/2020
Doğan ŞAHİN
1985
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
47268/20
Kuzu v. Türkiye
15/10/2020
Turgay KUZU
1989
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
47269/20
Çakan v. Türkiye
19/10/2020
Sadi ÇAKAN
1982
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
47270/20
Kaçan v. Türkiye
19/10/2020
Hüseyin KAÇAN
1990
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
47272/20
Gülen v. Türkiye
19/10/2020
Selman GÜLEN
1980
İzmir
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
47273/20
Temel v. Türkiye
19/10/2020
Mehmet Emin TEMEL
1986
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
47275/20
Barçağ v. Türkiye
19/10/2020
Kamil BARÇAĞ
1980
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
47276/20
Kaya v. Türkiye
19/10/2020
Vedat KAYA
1988
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÇAVDAR
50444/20
Varlık v. Türkiye
04/11/2020
İbrahim VARLIK
1980
Ankara
Turkish
Adem UZAK
52541/20
Güler v. Türkiye
23/10/2020
Muammer GÜLER
1983
Manisa
Turkish
Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY
4504/21
Becer v. Türkiye
14/01/2021
Fatih BECER
1980
Ankara
Turkish
Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN
4507/21
Kurt v. Türkiye
14/01/2021
Günay KURT
1979
Samsun
Turkish
Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN
7659/21
Çetin v. Türkiye
22/01/2021
Önder ÇETİN
1983
Nevşehir
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
14504/21
Yamak v. Türkiye
04/03/2021
Hasan Hüseyin YAMAK
1973
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
15772/21
Aşuk v. Türkiye
19/03/2021
Adem AŞUK
1979
Aydın
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
17498/21
Özyurt v. Türkiye
19/03/2021
Sadık ÖZYURT
1981
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
24942/21
Gözel v. Türkiye
22/04/2021
Tuğbahan GÖZEL
1981
Istanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ