SECOND SECTION
CASE OF TUGANBAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 8254/18 and 34 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
13 June 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Tuganbayev and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
Frédéric Krenc,
Davor Derenčinović, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 23 May 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of various public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58‑85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO).
REMAINING COMPLAINTS14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 10 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. The Court has further examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible;Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 13 June 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
8254/18
05/02/2018
and
62360/19
18/11/2019
Arman Askarovich TUGANBAYEV
1998
Preobrazhenskaya Oksana Vladimirovna
Strasbourg;
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Anti-corruption rally
Moscow
26/03/2017
Opposition rally
Moscow
05/05/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
fine of RUB 150,000
Moscow City Court
14/08/2017
Moscow City Court
18/06/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. on 26//03/2017 until 8 a.m. on 27/03/2017, and from 6.30 p.m. on 05/05/2018 until 1.40 p.m. on 06/05/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
6,000
14963/18
12/03/2018
and
6955/19
21/01/2019
Aleksey Nikolayevich YEFREMOV
1974
Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich
Moscow;
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Anti-corruption rally
Vladimir
12/06/2017
Opposition rally
Vladimir
05/05/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
community work for 30 hours
fine of RUB 10,000
Vladimir Regional Court
27/09/2017
Vladimir Regional Court
06/09/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
44634/18
03/09/2018
and
50509/18
10/10/2018
Sergey Leonidovich GRIVKO
1986
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally in support of A. Navalnyy’s
candidacy for the 2018 presidential elections
Rostov-on-Don
24/12/2017
Opposition rally
Rostov-on-Don
05/05/2018
Protest against retirement age hike
Rostov-on-Don
09/09/2018
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
detention for 6 days
detention for 2 days
Rostov Regional Court
13/03/2018
Rostov Regional Court
11/05/2018
Rostov Regional Court
26/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. on 05/05/2018 until 10 a.m. on 06/05/2018, and from 3.26 p.m. on 09/09/2018 until 3.30 p.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
6,000
50128/18
10/10/2018
Aleksandr Vladimirovich SMIRNOV
1990
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Opposition rally
Yaroslavl
05/05/2018
Political rally
Yaroslavl
20/05/2018
Protest against retirement age hike
Yaroslavl
01/07/2018
Protest against retirement age hike
Yaroslavl
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000
150 hours of community work
Yaroslavl Regional Court
27/08/2018
Yaroslavl Regional Court
06/08/2018
Yaroslavl Regional Court
04/09/2018
Yaroslavl Regional Court
13/11/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
5247/19
20/12/2018
and
42571/21
12/08/2021
Mikhail Vyacheslavovich DOLIYEV
1976
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Opposition rally
Astrakhan
05/05/2018
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Astrakhan
23/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000
Astrakhan Regional Court
29/06/2018
Astrakhan Regional Court
26/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 05/05/2018 and 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
5266/19
21/12/2018
Anatoliy Grigoryevich NOGOVITSYN
1987
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Opposition rally
Yakutsk
05/05/2018
Protest against retirement age hike
Yakutsk
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 3 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 30,000
detention for 20 days
Supreme Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
28/06/2018
Supreme Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
14/09/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
6012/19
14/01/2019
Ivan Denisovich FINOGEYEV
1996
Opposition march
Penza
05/05/2018
Protest against retirement age hike
Penza
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
detention for 10 days
Penza Regional Court
19/07/2018
Penza Regional Court
06/02/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – (1) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 05/05/2018; (2) escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 6.47 p.m. on 13/09/2018 until 2 p.m. on 14/09/2018.
5,000
8000/19
23/01/2019
Lyudmila Ivanovna FILATOVA
1954
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Opposition rally
Smolensk
05/05/2018
Protest against retirement age hike
Smolensk
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000
community work for 60 hours
Smolensk Regional Court
15/08/2018
Smolensk Regional Court
31/10/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
13141/19
22/02/2019
and
49803/19
13/09/2019
Artem Aleksandrovich AGEYEV
1995
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Opposition rally
Krasnoyarsk
05/05/2018
Protest against retirement age hike
Krasnoyarsk
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
11/10/2018
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
21/03/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.15 p.m. until 6.05 p.m. on 05/05/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
13193/19
13/02/2019
and
47643/19
28/08/2019
Alina Sergeyevna IVANOVA
1996
Gayazova Regina Fargatovna
Kazan
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Opposition rally
Moscow
05/05/2018
Political rally
Moscow
13/05/2019
Protest against retirement age hike
Moscow
09/09/2018
Rally to call for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Rally to call for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
10/08/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
detention for 5 days
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 15,000
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
20/11/2018
Moscow City Court
30/05/2019
Moscow City Court
28/02/2019
Moscow City Court
18/10/2019
Moscow City Court
22/10/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – (1) escorting to and detention at the police station from 9.20 p.m. on 13/05/2019 until 3.05 p.m. on 15/05/2018; (2) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 27/07/2019 and 10/08/2019;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
6,000
13509/19
25/02/2019
Andrey Sergeyevich CHVANOV
1976
Akhtyamova Chulpan Salavatovna
Kazan
Protest against retirement age hike
Naberezhnyye Chelny
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
07/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – (1) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 09/09/2018; (2) escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.05 p.m. on 12/09/2018 until 9.15 a.m. on 13/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
14207/19
25/02/2019
Ilmir Rafaelevich SHAKUROV
1986
Akhtyamova Chulpan Salavatovna
Kazan
Protest against retirement age hike
Naberezhnye Chelny
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
07/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. until 6.30 p.m. on 09/09/2018 and from 4.10 p.m. on 12/09/2018 until 2.40 p.m. to 13/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
17922/19
18/03/2019
Sergey Aleksandrovich SEMENOV
1988
Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich
Kazan
Protest against retirement age hike
Omsk
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Omsk Regional Court
11/12/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 09/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
19080/19
25/03/2019
Irina Evertovna SAYKONEN
1956
Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy d’Anjou
Political rally
St Petersburg
01/05/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
25/09/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.30 p.m. until 9.25 p.m. on 01/05/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
19897/19
01/04/2019
Aleksey Anatolyevich FEFELOV
1985
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Protest against retirement age hike
St Petersburg
09/09/2018
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
25/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5 p.m. on 09/09/2018 until 8 a.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
19901/19
01/04/2019
Aleksandr Aleksandrovich REMIZOV
1985
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Protest against retirement age hike
Lipetsk
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Lipetsk Regional Court
08/11/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
20057/19
01/04/2019
and
9581/20
12/02/2020
Nikita Igorevich IVANOV
1990
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Protest against retirement age hike
Krasnoyarsk
09/09/2018
Rally to call for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 15,000
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
17/01/2019
Moscow City Court
28/11/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 27/07/2019;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
20286/19
02/04/2019
Ayrat Sergeyevich PANTELEYEV
1991
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Opposition rally
Moscow
05/05/2018
Protest against pension reform
Naberezhnye Chelny
18/11/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
16/11/2018
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
30/01/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 05/05/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
21039/19
03/04/2019
Valentin Sergeyevich YAAKSON
1988
Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich
Kazan
Protest against retirement age hike
Omsk
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Omsk Regional Court
22/01/2019
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
21041/19
03/04/2019
Aleksandr Anatolyevich TYULENEV
1984
Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich
Kazan
Protest against retirement age hike
Omsk
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Omsk Regional Court
15/01/2019
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
21176/19
01/04/2019
Aleksandr Sergeyevich GOLOVENKO
1971
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Protest against retirement age hike
Belgorod
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
community work for 40 hours
Belgorod Regional Court
29/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 09/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
21183/19
01/04/2019
Artem Alekseyevich KRYLTSOV
1997
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Protest against retirement age hike
St Petersburg
09/09/2018
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
25/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.10 a.m. until 8 a.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
24447/19
08/04/2019
Violetta Andreyevna GRUDINA
1990
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Protest against retirement age hike
Murmansk
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 150,000
Murmansk Regional Court
21/11/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,500
28600/19
14/05/2019
Vera Aleksandrovna OLEYNIKOVA
2000
Yelanchik Oleg Aleksandrovich
Moscow
Protest against retirement age hike
Moscow
10/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
14/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
30092/19
29/05/2019
Vadim Vladimirovich YERMAKOV
1985
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Opposition rally
Smolensk
05/05/2018
Protest against retirement age hike
Smolensk
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000
Smolensk Regional Court
16/01/2019
Smolensk Regional Court
06/02/2019
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
49305/19
12/09/2019
and
44234/21
23/08/2021
Gerasim Dmitriyevich ARTEMYEV
1987
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Galeyeva Tatyana Olegovna
Krasnoyarsk
Protest against retirement age hike
Krasnoyarsk
09/09/2018
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Krasnoyarsk
31/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
fine of RUB 150,000
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
21/03/2019
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
25/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
5,500
51193/19
18/09/2019
Alena Gennadyevna VODOLAGINA
1978
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich
St Petersburg
Political rally
St Petersburg
01/05/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
28/05/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 01/05/2019;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.