FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF VASIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 38346/21 and 28 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
28 March 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Vasin and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Branko Lubarda, President,
Armen Harutyunyan,
Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 7 March 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention and its Protocol.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocol in the light of its findings in Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, 26 April 2016, concerning disproportionate measures taken against participants in solo manifestations; and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning the fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocol thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Branko Lubarda
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal offence
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under
well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
38346/21
02/07/2021
Sergey Yevgenyevich VASIN
1965
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
28/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. to 6 p.m. on 21/04/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision Moscow City Court, 28/04/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the applicant started serving his sentence – administrative arrest – before the appeal judgment was delivered
4,000
52322/21
01/10/2021
Veronika Konstantinovna SANDER
1992
Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
07/04/2021
3,500
1601/22
10/12/2021
Rinat Maratovich DAVLETGILDEYEV
1986
Gilmanov Mansur Idrisovich
Podolsk
Placing LGBT flag on the FSB building “to celebrate President Putin’s Birthday”
Moscow
07/10/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
17/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 11.10 a.m. to 3.09 p.m. on 29/10/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 17/08/2020
4,000
4505/22
11/12/2021
Petr Sergeyevich MIRONOV
1990
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
11/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 0.15 a.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 11/06/2021
4,000
4508/22
11/12/2021
Maksim Aleksandrovich VOLKOV
1996
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
21/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7.05 p.m. for more than 3 hours on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 21/06/2021
4,000
5701/22
20/01/2022
(4 applicants)
Aleksandra Vladimirovna POLIVANOVA
1976
Aleksandr Vladimirovich BOGOMAZ
1976
Ivan Denisovich FINOGEYEV
1996
Sergey Sergeyevich VLASOV
1986
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Party congress
meeting
Velikiy Novgorod
22/05/2021
article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 3,000 (Ms Polivanova)
fine of RUB 4,000 (Mr Bogomaz)
fine of RUB 5,000 (Mr Vlasov)
fine of RUB 3,000 (Mr Finogeyev)
Novgorod Regional Court
20/07/2021
Novgorod Regional Court
20/07/2021
Novgorod Regional Court
30/07/2021
Novgorod Regional Court
05/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – all sets of the proceedings: Final decisions: Novgorod Regional Court, 20/07/2021, 30/07/2021, 05/08/2021
3,500,
to each of the applicants
6430/22
30/12/2021
Kirill Alekseyevich GLADKOV
1999
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
05/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7 p.m. for more than 3 hours on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/07/2021
4,000
7975/22
17/01/2022
Nikita Aleksandrovich YESIN
1990
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Protest against road construction
Moscow
19/03/2020
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest on 19/03/2020 and detention from 11.25 p.m. for more than 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 19/07/2021
4,000
51393/22
01/10/2022
Ilya Andreyevich MINOCHKIN
1997
Bushmakov Aleksey Vladimirovich
Yekaterinburg
Anti-war protest
Yekaterinburg
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
community service of
25 hours
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
08/06/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 08/06/2022
4,000
51394/22
01/10/2022
Leonid Vladimirovich LUKINYKH
1987
Bushmakov Aleksey Vladimirovich
Yekaterinburg
Anti-war protest
Yekaterinburg
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
24/08/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 24/08/2022
4,000
51500/22
24/10/2022
Irina-Lika Petrovna SUKHOVA
1976
Arshinova Valeriya Aleksandrovna
Moscow
Anti-war protest
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
27/06/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 27/06/2022
4,000
51506/22
21/10/2022
Maksim Vyacheslavovich KHARIN
1999
Anti-war protest
Yekaterinburg
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
22/06/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2.02 p.m. to 11.50 p.m. on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 22/06/2022
4,000
52036/22
21/10/2022
Fail Mazitovich GATIYATULLIN
1987
Baranova Natalya Andreyevna
Moscow
Anti-war protest
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
29/06/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. to 10 p.m. on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 29/06/2022
4,000
52374/22
25/10/2022
Kirill Petrovich SHUMILOV
1994
Baranova Natalya Andreyevna
Moscow
Anti-war protest
Ulyanovsk
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Ulyanovsk Regional Court
30/06/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2.20 p.m. to 7.40 p.m. on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Ulyanovsk Regional Court, 30/06/2022
4,000
53382/22
31/10/2022
Yuliya Vladimirovna DEMUTSKAYA
2001
Baranova Natalya Andreyevna
Moscow
Anti-war protest
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
13/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. to 11.45 p.m. on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 13/07/2022
4,000
54426/22
28/10/2022
Aleksandra Mikhaylovna SPIRIDONOVA
1989
Anti-war protest
Moscow
04/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
01/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4.30 p.m. to 7.01 p.m. on 04/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 01/07/2022
4,000
54442/22
07/11/2022
Marina Viktorovna NARYZHNAYA
1984
Anti-war protest
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
25/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 3.10 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 25/07/2022
4,000
55570/22
12/11/2022
Darya Leonidovna YURISHCHEVA
1986
Arshinova Valeriya Aleksandrovna
Moscow
Anti-war protest
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
15/08/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 15/08/2022
4,000
55630/22
13/11/2022
Aleksey Andreyevich SIDYUKOV
1996
Anti-war protest
Moscow
24/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
13/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7.50 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 3.10 a.m. on 25/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 13/07/2022
4,000
55700/22
21/11/2022
Maksim Sergeyevich SVESHNIKOV
1990
Anti-war protest
Moscow
03/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
21/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7.10 p.m. to 11.55 p.m. on 03/03/2022 and from 3.20 p.m. to 5.00 p.m. on 04/06/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decisions: Moscow City Court, 21/07/2022 and 16/08/2022,
Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - solo picket against the war in Ukraine on 04/06/2022, final decision: by the Moscow City Court, on 16/08/2022; the applicant was fined
4,000
55909/22
12/11/2022
Mark Yuryevich NARUSOV
1998
Anti-war protest
Moscow
28/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
15/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7.50 p.m. on 28/02/2022 to 1 a.m. on 01/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 15/07/2022
4,000
55928/22
25/10/2022
Vyacheslav Yevgenyevich POSPEKOV
1990
Baranova Natalya Andreyevna
Moscow
Anti-war protest
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
27/06/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 27/06/2022
4,000
55933/22
19/11/2022
Vladislav Konstantinovich STEZHKO
2003
Anti-war protest
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
19/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 12 p.m. on 07/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 19/07/2022
4,000
56005/22
28/11/2022
Andrey Aleksandrovich DEMKIN
1996
Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna
Barnaul
Anti-war protest
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
27/09/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 3.30 p.m. to 9.50 p.m. on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal
4,000
56619/22
24/11/2022
Aleksey Yuryevich MUNYOS
2002
Anti-war protest
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
25/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. to 8 p.m. on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 25/07/2022
4,000
56902/22
19/11/2022
Anna Sergeyevna STEFANOVICH
1991
Pilipenko Anastasiya Vladimirovna
St Petersburg
Anti-war protest
St Petersburg
27/02/2022
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
19/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 6.15 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 0.50 a.m. on 28/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 19/07/2022
4,000
56903/22
19/11/2022
Polina Valeryevna POPOVA
1992
Pilipenko Anastasiya Vladimirovna
St Petersburg
Anti-war protest
St Petersburg
06/03/2022
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
19/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4.36 p.m. to 11.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 19/07/2022
4,000
56918/22
17/11/2022
Olga Viktorovna LYUTTSER
2000
Anti-war protest
Moscow
27/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
21/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 5.40 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 1.05 a.m. on 28/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 21/07/2022
4,000
56920/22
17/11/2022
Igor Mikhaylovich MAKARSHIN
1963
Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich
Moscow
Manifestation in memory of B. Nemtsov
Moscow
27/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
25/07/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 5.30 p.m. to 11.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 25/07/2022
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.