Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)208
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in
Two cases against Georgia
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
73241/01
DAVTYAN
27/07/2006
27/10/2006
68622/01
DANELIA
17/10/2006
17/01/2007
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 November 2014
at the 1211th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2014)1197);
Having satisfied itself that all the individual measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
Taking into account that the issues related to general measures are supervised within the context of the Gharibashvili group of cases, which concerns the lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill‑treatment in police custody,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy