Published on 4 November 2024
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 25406/22
Abdi CENGİZ against Türkiye
and 2 other applications
(see list appended)
communicated on 16 October 2024
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The applications concern the right of the applicants, who were detained at the time of the events, to confidential communication with their family members.
Relying on Article 8 of the Convention, the applicants complain about the monitoring by an officer or the recording by means of technical devices of their meetings with their family members during their visits in prison.
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES
Has there been an interference with the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life and/or correspondence, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, on account of the presence of an officer during the applicants’ meetings with their family members and/or the recording of their conversations?
If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2 (see, for example, Doerga v. the Netherlands, no. 50210/99, §§ 43-53, 27 April 2004, and Wisse v. France, no. 71611/01, §§ 24-34, 20 December 2005)?
APPENDIX
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant
Year of Birth
Place of Residence
Nationality
1.
25406/22
Cengiz v. Türkiye
10/05/2022
Abdi CENGİZ
1965
Ankara
Turkish
2.
6297/23
Aktürk v. Türkiye
26/01/2023
Mehmet Emin AKTÜRK
1990
Adana
Turkish
3.
11027/23
Küçüksolak v. Türkiye
17/02/2023
Erkan KÜÇÜKSOLAK
1975
İzmir
Turkish