THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 28971/10
Igor Vladimirovich CHERTOV against Russia
and 4 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 14 February 2019 as a Committee composed of:
Alena Poláčková, President,
Dmitry Dedov,
Jolien Schukking, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints, as listed in the appended table, were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits.
By letters sent by registered post on the dates indicated in the appended table, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 6 April 2017 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.
The applicants in all of the applications, except for application no. 15782/14, received the letters from the Court and did not reply or did not claim them at the post office (see the appended table). In application no. 15782/14 the Court’s letter, dispatched to the address of the applicant’s detention facility, did not reach the applicant because he had been released from detention and had not communicated his new address.
None of the applicants have been in contact with the Court since the dates indicated in the appended table.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications.
Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 7 March 2019.
Liv TigerstedtAlena Poláčková
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident
APPENDIX
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant
Date of birth
Place of residence
Complaints communicated
Date of strike-out warning letter of the Court
Addressee of the strike-out warning
Report on reception
The latest correspondence sent by the applicant to the Court on
1.
28971/10
09/04/2010
Igor Vladimirovich CHERTOV
22/09/1971
Belnyaki
Articles 3, 8 and 13 of the Convention
19/03/2018
applicant
Received on 06/04/2018, no reply followed
16/02/2012
2.
20028/13
26/02/2013
Yevgeniy Valeryevich ANOSHIN
27/07/1983
Torzhok
Articles 3, 8 and 13 of the Convention
19/03/2018 10/10/2018
applicant
The first letter – undelivered according to delivery tracking report (unclaimed)
The second letter – received on 23/10/2018, no reply followed
29/10/2015
3.
9082/14
25/12/2013
Vladimir Nikolayevich SHEVCHENKO
23/06/1978
Kushmangort
Articles 3, 8 and 13 of the Convention
19/03/2018
applicant
Received on 07/04/2018, no reply followed
02/11/2016
4.
10488/14
31/03/2014
Sergey Grigoryevich SINELNIKOV
20/07/1951
Volokolamsk
Represented by:
Sergey Yevgenyevich NUYANZIN
Articles 3, 8 and 13 of the Convention
19/03/2018
representative
Received on 06/04/2018, no reply followed
25/07/2017
5.
15782/14
30/08/2014
Sergey Aleksandrovich GAVSHIN
04/01/1972
Rostov-na-Donu
Articles 3, 8 and 13 of the Convention
19/03/2018 10/10/2018
applicant
The first letter – undelivered according to delivery tracking report
The second letter – received
back by the Court undelivered with notice that the applicant had been released from the detention facility
30/08/2014
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy