SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 26931/09
Ecaterina COROI
against the Republic of Moldova
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 24 November 2015 as a Committee composed of:
Nebojša Vučinić, President,
Valeriu Griţco,
Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, judges,
and Abel Campos, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 11 May 2009,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Ms Ecaterina Coroi, is a Moldovan national, who was born in 1978 and lives in Wien. She was represented before the Court by Ms D. Pagoni, a lawyer practising in Chișinău.
The Moldovan Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr L. Apostol.
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
The case was communicated to the Government on 12 July 2013 and they duly submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit her own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
By a letter dated 20 June 2014, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of her observations had expired on 17 March 2014 and that no extension of the deadline had been requested. The applicant’s representative’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant’s representative received that letter on 27 June 2014. However, no response has been received.
THE LAW
The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue her application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 17 December 2015.
Abel CamposNebojša Vučinić
Deputy RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy