FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 62115/19
Edvárd Attila CSATLÓS against Hungary
and 4 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 3 September 2020 as a Committee composed of:
Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, President,
Georges Ravarani,
Jolien Schukking, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”).
The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 24 September 2020.
Liv TigerstedtStéphanie Mourou-Vikström
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention
(excessive length of pre-trial detention)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Date of birth
Representative’s name and location
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant (in euros)[1]
62115/19
06/11/2019
Edvárd Attila CSATLÓS
10/05/2000
Kiss Dominika Szilvia
Budapest
10/07/2020
03/04/2020
2,300
65052/19
09/12/2019
Lajos DARÓK
24/09/1954
Karsai Dániel András
Budapest
10/07/2020
03/04/2020
3,900
65053/19
09/12/2019
Krisztina FARKAS
04/12/1979
Karsai Dániel András
Budapest
16/04/2020
27/07/2020
2,700
2603/20
25/12/2019
Ernő BÓDI
25/10/1982
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
01/07/2020
12/03/2020
2,200
4426/20
13/01/2020
Tibor SUKI
19/05/1993
Kiss Dominika Szilvia
Budapest
10/07/2020
13/03/2020
2,700
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy