THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 66623/12
Barna CSIBI
against Romania
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 17 March 2015 as a Committee composed of:
Ján Šikuta, President,
Dragoljub Popović,
Iulia Antoanella Motoc, judges,
and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 6 August 2012,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Barna Csibi, is a Romanian and Hungarian national, who was born in 1979 and lives in Miercurea Ciuc.
The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms C. Brumar, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Relying on Articles 6, 10 and 11 of the Convention the applicant raised several complaints before the Court.
The applicant’s complaints under Articles 10 and 11 concerning the administrative sanctions imposed on him for organising on his own a public event were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
By letter dated 18 March 2014, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 6 March 2014 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant received this letter on 14 April 2014. However, no response has been received.
THE LAW
The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 9 April 2015.
Marialena TsirliJán Šikuta
Deputy RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy