FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 33710/13
Tibor CSIKÓS against Hungary
and 7 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23 November 2017 as a Committee composed of:
Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,
Georges Ravarani,
Marko Bošnjak, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In application no. 48477/13 another complaint based on the same facts was also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention.
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 14 December 2017.
Liv TigerstedtVincent A. De Gaetano
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident
APPENDIX
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant name
Date of birth
Representative name and location
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Date of receipt of Government declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant/household
(in euros)[i]
33710/13
07/05/2013
Tibor Csikós
21/11/1961
Borsos Tamás
Budapest
08/08/2017
12/06/2017
2,500
34632/13
24/05/2013
Zoltán Miklós
23/06/1977
Borsos Tamás
Budapest
13/09/2017
12/06/2017
1,500
48212/13
18/07/2013
István Baumgartner
02/11/1968
Borsos Tamás
Budapest
19/07/2017
12/06/2017
2,500
48477/13
18/07/2013
József Lukács
31/05/1959
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings -
11/08/2017
07/06/2017
5,000
42475/14
15/05/2014
Róbert Czuth
13/10/1967
Borsos Tamás
Budapest
15/09/2017
12/06/2017
12,000
53522/16
17/08/2016
Vilma Sztojka
05/07/1957
Mester Csaba
Budapest
13/09/2017
12/06/2017
3,000
57269/16
27/09/2016
György Ferenc Várnai
08/02/1958
Versitz Piroska
Dunakeszi
14/09/2017
29/06/2017
6,000
22427/17
27/09/2016
Éva Mercédesz Ballai
30/07/1977
Versitz Piroska
Dunakeszi
15/09/2017
29/06/2017
8,000
[i]. Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy