FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 22486/22
Máté CSURÁR against Hungary
and 5 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 8 December 2022 as a Committee composed of:
Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President,
Ivana Jelić,
Erik Wennerström, judges,
and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above‑mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 12 January 2023.
Attila Teplán Krzysztof Wojtyczek
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention
(excessive length of pre-trial detention)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
22486/22
28/04/2022
Máté CSURÁR
2001
Karsai Dániel András
Budapest
10/11/2022
18/10/2022
3,900
22499/22
28/04/2022
Erika Ilona BOTOSNÉ CSIKLYA
1987
Karsai Dániel András
Budapest
19/08/2022
25/10/2022
2,600
22504/22
28/04/2022
Péter CSURÁR
1968
Karsai Dániel András
Budapest
10/11/2022
14/10/2022
3,900
29590/22
26/05/2022
Péter CSURÁR
1993
Karsai Dániel András
Budapest
10/11/2022
14/10/2022
3,900
33436/22
29/06/2022
András BUDAI
1972
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - The statutory 1-year review was carried out with a delay of 3 months.
04/11/2022
19/10/2022
5,700
33438/22
29/06/2022
András BUDAI
1999
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - The statutory 1-year review was carried out with a delay of 3 months.
26/10/2022
26/09/2022
5,900
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.