SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 33262/13
Sevgi ÇÜVEN against Turkey
and 6 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 22 March 2018 as a Committee composed of:
Valeriu Griţco, President,
Jon Fridrik Kjølbro,
Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”).
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 12 April 2018.
Liv TigerstedtValeriu Griţco
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of civil proceedings)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant name
Date of birth
Representative name and location
Date of receipt of Government declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant (in euros)[i]
33262/13
29/04/2013
Sevgi Çüven
03/01/1972
14/12/2017
31/10/2017
3,000
6020/16
04/01/2016
Ayhan Dağ
15/10/1971
Derin Kemal
Adana
06/02/2018
05/01/2017
2,000
34066/16
31/05/2016
Cuma Tiryaki
15/04/1983
Bozkurt Saim
Ankara
06/02/2018
02/01/2017
1,300
34073/16
31/05/2016
Kadriye Tiryaki
01/01/1949
Bozkurt Saim
Ankara
06/02/2018
02/01/2017
800
34080/16
31/05/2016
Mehmet Tiryaki
04/04/1981
Bozkurt Saim
Ankara
07/02/2018
02/01/2017
1,300
34085/16
31/05/2016
Hikmet Tiryaki
04/04/1972
Bozkurt Saim
Ankara
07/02/2018
02/01/2017
1,300
35384/16
31/05/2016
Muhbet Akdaş
01/07/1915
Bozkurt Saim
Ankara
07/02/2018
02/01/2017
1,300
[i]. Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy