FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 29399/12
Leszek DWORAKOWSKI
against Poland
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 1 July 2014 as a Committee composed of:
Päivi Hirvelä, President,
Nona Tsotsoria,
Faris Vehabović, judges,
and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 2 May 2012,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Leszek Dworakowski, is a Polish national, who was born in 1969 and lives in Koszalin.
The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms J. Chrzanowska of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
On 27 September 2013 the President of the Section decided to communicate part of the applicant’s complaint under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the conditions of his detention in Koszalin Remand Centre. The remainder was declared inadmissible on virtue of the President of the Section sitting as a Single Judge.
By letters dated 11 October 2013 the Registrar requested the parties to inform her whether they wished to settle the case by means of a friendly settlement. The Government responded on 6 December 2013.
By a letter of 17 December 2013 the applicant was requested to inform the Registry of the Court, by 6 January 2014, about his position on the friendly settlement proposal. He did not respond to this letter. On 7 January 2014 the Court was informed by the Governor of the Czarne Prison that the applicant was released and thus the correspondence should be delivered to his new address. By another letter of 28 January 2014, sent by registered post, the applicant was again requested to provide the relevant information by 17 February 2014. The letter was delivered on 3 February 2014 and collected by the applicant. By another letter of 20 March 2014, sent by registered post, the applicant was again requested to provide the relevant information by 10 April 2014. The letter was delivered on 26 March 2014 and collected by the applicant’s mother. To date, the applicant has not replied to the letters, nor has he otherwise resumed contact with the Court.
THE LAW
Given the above-mentioned circumstances of the case, the Court concludes that the applicant is no longer interested in pursuing his application. Furthermore, the Court finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the application out of the Court’s list of cases, pursuant to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.
Fatoş AracıPäivi Hirvelä
Deputy RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy