Communicated on 18 January 2021
Published on 8 February 2021
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 10570/18
Halil ERDOĞAN
against Turkey
lodged on 1 February 2018
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The application concerns the non-execution of a final judicial decision awarding the applicant compensation for de facto expropriation of a plot of land which he partially owned.
The applicant complains of a violation of his rights under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention arguing that despite the Constitutional Court’s decisions finding violations for non‑execution of domestic decisions in his favour, the decision in question has not been fully executed.
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right of access to court, guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and his right of peaceful enjoyment of his possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the authorities’ alleged failure to fully execute the final judicial decision delivered in the applicant’s favour (see Kuzu v. Turkey, no. 13062/03, 17 January 2006; Yerebasmaz v. Turkey, no. 14710/03, 10 October 2006; M. Kaplan v. Turkey, no. 29016/04, 9 December 2008; and Necati Erol v. Turkey, no. 4387/08, 3 November 2011)?
The parties are invited to submit updated and detailed information on the state of execution of the court’s judgment.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy