SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 24271/07
Şükrü Barış ERGEZER
against Turkey
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 10 January 2017 as a Committee composed of:
Paul Lemmens, President,
Ksenija Turković,
Jon Fridrik Kjølbro, judges,
and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 4 June 2007,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
1. The applicant, Mr Şükrü Barış Ergezer, is a Turkish national, who was born in 1981 and lives in Tarsus. He was represented before the Court by Ms Ö. Yıldız, Mr A. Aktay and Mr T. Akıllıoğlu, lawyers practising in Mersin.
2. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
3. The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the lack of fairness of the proceedings before the Supreme Military Administrative Court on account of his inability to have access to classified documents submitted by the Ministry of Defence to that court in the course of the judicial proceedings.
4. On 2 August 2016 and 6 October 2016 respectively the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 6,500 (six thousand five hundred) euros (EUR) to cover any and all pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as EUR 500 (five hundred) for costs and expenses, which will be converted into Turkish liras at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
5. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 2 February 2017.
Hasan BakırcıPaul Lemmens
Deputy RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy