Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 March 2011 – Centre de coordination Carrefour v Commission
(Case C-254/10 P)
Appeal – Aid scheme in favour of coordination centres established in Belgium – Conditions of admissibility of an action for annulment – Concept of ‘interest in bringing proceedings’ – Res judicata
Appeals – Grounds – Mistaken assessment of the facts – Inadmissibility – review by the Court of the assessment made of the evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58(1)) (see paras 36-38)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 – Case T-94/08 Centre de Coordination Carrefour v Commission , by which that Court dismissed as inadmissible the applicant’s action seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2008/283/EC of 13 November 2007 amending Decision 2003/757/EC on the aid scheme implemented by Belgium for coordination centres established in Belgium (OJ 2008 L 90, p. 7) – Conditions of admissibility of an action for annulment – Concept of interest in bringing proceedings – Res judicata.
Operative Part:
1.
The appeal is dismissed.
2.
The Centre de Coordination Carrefour SNC is ordered to bear the costs.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy