31.8.2013
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/8
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 July 2013 — Gosselin Group NV v European Commission, Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje
(Case C-429/11 P) (1)
(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - International removal services market in Belgium - Direct or indirect fixing of prices, market-sharing and the manipulation of the procedure for the submission of tenders - Classification - Infringement of competition by object - Obligation to state reasons - Guidelines on the effect on trade between Member States - Legal force - Obligation to define the relevant market - Scope - Guidelines on the method of setting fines (2006) - Proportion of the value of sales - Gravity of the infringement - Mitigating circumstances - Obligation to state reasons - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 25 - Limitation period - Repeated infringment)
2013/C 252/11
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Appellant: Gosselin Group NV (represented by: F. Wijckmans, H. Burez and S. De Keer, avocaten)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents), Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 June 2011 in Case T-208/08 Gosselin Group v Commission and Case T-209/08 Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje, by which the General Court, in Case T-208/08, annulled Commission Decision C(2008) 926 final of 11 March 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.543 — International Removal Services), in so far as that decision finds that Gosselin Group NV participated in an infringement of Article 81(1) EC from 30 October 1993 to 14 November 1996 and, in Case T-209/08, annulled Decision C(2008) 926, as amended by Decision C(2009) 5810, in so far as it relates to Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.
Dismisses the appeal;
2.
Orders Gosselin Group NV to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 331, 12.11.2011.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy