13.8.2011
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 238/32
Action brought on 14 June 2011 — Süd-Chemie v OHIM — BYK-Cera (CERATIX)
(Case T-312/11)
2011/C 238/53
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Süd-Chemie AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: W. Baron von der Osten-Sacken and A. Wenninger-Lenz, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BYK-Cera BV (Deventer, Netherlands)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—
Annul the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 April 2011 (Case R 1585/2010-4);
—
Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: BYK-Cera BV
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘CERATIX’ for goods in Class 1 — application No 6 358 832
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: the national word mark ‘CERATOFIX’ for goods in Class 1
Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the Opposition Division’s decision was annulled and the opposition was rejected
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 15 and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 as the defendant:
—
Erred in reducing the evidential value of the documents submitted by the applicant with the general reasoning that they are connected with the applicant itself;
—
Did not take account of promotional measures as ‘genuine use’;
—
Did not include all the relevant circumstances in assessing whether the use of the trade mark was genuine and;
—
Did not examine the evidence of use provided as a whole.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy