4.2.2012
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 32/29
Action brought on 15 November 2011 — Przedsiębiorstwo Handlowe Medox Lepiarz Lepiarz v OHIM — Henkel (SUPER GLUE)
(Case T-591/11)
2012/C 32/59
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Przedsiębiorstwo Handlowe Medox Lepiarz Jarosław Lepiarz Alicja sp. j. (Jaworzno, Republic of Poland) (represented by: M. Konieczyński, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Henkel Corp. (Gulph Mills, United States)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—
annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 September 2011 in Case R 1147/2010-4;
—
order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs of representation in the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Przedsiębiorstwo Handlowe Medox Lepiarz Lepiarz
Community trade mark concerned: figurative trade mark depicting a tube in the colours white, black, grey and yellow and containing the word element ‘SUPER GLUE’, for goods in Classes 1 and 16 — Community trade mark application No 7 262 405
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Henkel Corp.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark No 377 517‘SUPERGLUE’ registered in Benelux, for goods in Classes 1 and 16
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition partially upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (1) as regards establishment of the similarity of the trade marks and of the likelihood of confusion on the part of consumers
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy