6.6.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 178/19
Order of the General Court of 27 March 2017 — Frank v Commission
(Case T-603/15) (1)
((Action for annulment - Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation - Calls for proposals and related activities under the ERC Work Programme 2015 - Decision of the ERCEA declaring the proposal submitted by the applicant ineligible - Implied decision of the Commission rejecting the administrative appeal relating to the decision of the ERCEA - Incorrect designation of the defendant - Inadmissibility))
(2017/C 178/25)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Regine Frank (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: initially W. Trautner, subsequently by E. Niitväli and M. Reysen, then by E. Niitväli, M. Reysen and S. Wachs, and finally S. Conrad, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and B. Conte, acting as agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision of the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) of 5 June 2015 relating, in the context of the ‘ERC starting grant’ programme, to proposal No 680151 of the applicant — which was not given a positive evaluation during step 1 and was not admitted to step 2 of the evaluation — and the Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s administrative appeal pursuant to Article 22(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes (OJ 2003 L 11, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1.
The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.
Ms Regine Frank and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.
(1) OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy