16.8.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 296/33
Action brought on 15 June 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (360o)
(Case T-333/16)
(2016/C 296/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler and A. Stolz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘360o’ — Application for registration No 14 042 188
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 April 2016 in Case R 2287/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—
annul the contested decision;
—
order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—
Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), (2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the rules of law relating to its application as set out in Article 65(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy