4.9.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 293/19
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 16 June 2017 — Ahmed Shajin v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal
(Case C-369/17)
(2017/C 293/22)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Ahmed Shajin
Defendant: Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal
Question referred
Does it follow from the expression ‘that he or she has committed a serious crime’ used in Article 17(1)(b) of Directive 2011/95/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, that the penalty provided for a specific crime under the law of the particular Member State may constitute the sole criterion to determine whether the person claiming subsidiary protection may be excluded from it?
(1) OJ 2011 L 337, p. 9.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy