Published on 27 March 2023
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 54923/21
Insaf Vasilevich GALIMULLIN against Russia
and 26 other applications
(see list appended)
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 2 March 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.
In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).
For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website.
SUBJECT MATTER
The applications concern the complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to the disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).
APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
54923/21*
29/10/2021
Insaf Vasilevich GALIMULLIN
1996
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
12/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 31/01/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect; he also complained of his overnight detention in the police station
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
55718/21*
05/11/2021
Danil Sergeyevich KASULIN
2002
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Tver
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Tver Regional Court
19/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
55754/21*
05/11/2021
Dmitriy Aleksandrovich SOLOKHA
2002
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Voronezh
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Voronezh Regional Court
13/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 31/01/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
55851/21*
05/11/2021
Kirill Andreyevich BOGATYRENKO
1992
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
23/01/2021
article 8-6-1 § 2 of the Law of St Petersburg on Administrative Offences in St Petersburg
administrative fine of RUB 4,000
Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg
18/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - the applicant complained of being taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
55892/21*
05/11/2021
Denis Vladimirovich MUKHOROTOV
2000
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Voronezh
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Voronezh Regional Court
18/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect. The applicant also complained that he remained in detention for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up without any justification: he was detained at 4.11 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and released at 10.15 p.m. on the same day
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
55987/21*
05/11/2021
Sana Aleksandrovna BEZMENOVA
1975
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 23/01/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
55990/21*
05/11/2021
Petr Borisovich KARTOYEV
1991
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 11,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
12/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 31/01/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine in the first-instance trial two police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
55995/21*
05/11/2021
Vadim Andreyevich GORYACHENKO
2003
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Novosibirsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Novosibirsk Regional Court
14/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 31/01/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
56954/21*
19/11/2021
Yekaterina Valeryevna MALYUTINA
1990
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Vladimir
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 11,000
Vladimir Regional Court
07/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 31/01/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements her conviction was based
58315/21*
27/11/2021
Maksim Anatolyevich KOLBIN
1985
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Perm
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Perm Regional Court
22/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 31/01/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
58526/21*
09/11/2021
Larisa Igorevna BESH
1962
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Kurgan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 15,000
Kurgan Regional Court
24/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect at 7:15 p.m. on 21/04/2021: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine in the appeal trial two police officers on whose written statements her conviction was based. She explained why their statements were relevant and decisive
58653/21*
19/11/2021
Ildar Gumarovich MEYKER
1990
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
26/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – on 21/04/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
58692/21*
19/11/2021
Konstantin Aleksandrovich LYAYFER
1984
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Saratov
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 20,000
Saratov Regional Court
24/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
58846/21*
27/11/2021
Aleksandr Sergeyevich SNURNIKOV
1981
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Chelyabinsk
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Chelyabinsk Regional Court
09/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 21/04/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
58864/21*
27/11/2021
Vitaliy Vasilyevich TYUTIKOV
2002
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
09/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – on 21/04/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
58905/21*
27/11/2021
Andrey Aleksandrovich MEKHONOSHIN
1985
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Perm
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Perm Regional Court
09/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 31/01/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
59002/21*
27/11/2021
Yekaterina Glebovna BARYSHKINA
2002
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
02/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis –the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect; detention as an administrative suspect beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO): she was detained from 8.00 p.m. on 21/04/2021 to 5.20 p.m. on 22/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
59054/21*
27/11/2021
Andrey Konstantinovich DEDKOV
1996
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Volgograd
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 15,000
Volgograd Regional Court
03/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 21/04/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
59068/21*
27/11/2021
Andrey Sergeyevich KOZINSKIY
1988
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Orenburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Orenburg Regional Court
21/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - the applicant was taken to a police station on 23/01/2021 as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
59071/21*
27/11/2021
Aleksandr Sergeyevich SHUMOV
1986
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Pushkin
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow Regional Court
29/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - The applicant was taken to a police station at 8 p.m. on 21/04/2021 as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
59145/21*
27/11/2021
Aleksandr Sergeyevich PORUBOV
1966
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Khabarovsk
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Khabarovsk Regional Court
08/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 21/04/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
59160/21*
27/11/2021
Kirill Alekseyevich KUSHIN
2001
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Perm
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Perm Regional Court
09/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - the applicant was taken to a police station at 2.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
59981/21*
03/12/2021
Ivan Viktorovich DROBOTOV
1995
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
21/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – on 23/01/2021 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
60029/21*
03/12/2021
Maksim Aleksandrovich ZEMSKIY
1993
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
23/01/2021
article 8-6-1 § 2 of St Petersburg Decree No 273‑70
administrative fine of RUB 4,000
Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg
06/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - the applicant was taken to a police station at 2 p.m. on 23/01/2021 as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
60180/21*
03/12/2021
Yekaterina Dmitriyevna MAYEVSKYA
1996
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Khabarovsk
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 5,000
Khabarovsk Regional Court
21/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - the applicant was taken to a police station at 9.30 a.m. on 26/04/2021 as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
60821/21*
07/12/2021
Kirill Andreyevich BELOUS
1997
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
09/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect. The applicant also complained that he remained in detention for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up without any justification: he was detained at 12.30 a.m. on 02/02/2021 and released at 6.45 a.m. on 03/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine in the first-instance trial two police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based
61719/21*
08/12/2021
Vladislav Aleksandrovich SPIVAKOV
2002
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Ufa
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic
19/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - the applicant complained of being taken to a police station at 8 p.m. as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the applicant complained of the inability to cross-examine police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based