THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 12127/11
Doina GANCEA and Dalina Liana SUCIU
against Romania
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 21 April 2015 as a Committee composed of:
Ján Šikuta, President,
Iulia Antoanella Motoc,
Branko Lubarda, judges,
and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 15 February 2011,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicants, Ms Doina Gancea and Ms Dalina Liana Suciu, are Romanian nationals, aunt and niece, who were born in 1955 and 1984 respectively and live in Arad. They were represented before the Court by Mr C. F. Costaș, a lawyer practising in Arad.
The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms C. Brumar, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of the civil proceedings in which they were involved. The complaint was communicated to the Government on 23 October 2014.
On 20 November 2014 and 6 February 2015 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agree to waive any further claims against Romania in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay each applicant EUR 1,200 (one thousand two hundred euros) to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which will be converted into Romanian lei at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. The amount will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 21 May 2015.
Marialena TsirliJán Šikuta
Deputy RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy