SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 40322/11
Éva HEGYESINÉ ORSÓS
against Hungary
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 2 September 2014 as a Committee composed of:
Helen Keller, President,
András Sajó,
Robert Spano, judges,
and Abel Campos, Deputy Section Registrar.
Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 June 2011,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Ms Éva Hegyesiné Orsós, is a Hungarian national, who was born in 1954 and lives in Budapest. She was represented before the Court by Mr E. Kiss, a lawyer practising in Budapest.
The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr Z. Tallódi, Agent, Ministry of Public Administration and Justice.
The applicant complained under Articles 7, 14 and 17 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the imposition of a special tax at a rate of 98 % on part of her severance pay.
On 13 March and 26 May 2014 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay her EUR 31,100 (thirty-one thousand one hundred euros) to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which will be converted into Hungarian forints at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Abel CamposHelen Keller
Deputy RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy