Communicated on 18 April 2016
FOURTH SECTION
Application no. 6248/15
József HOLLÓ
against Hungary
lodged on 26 January 2015
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
In application of Act nos. XC of 2010, CXXIV of 2010 and CCL of 2013, the upper bracket of the severance payment due to the applicant – a former employee of Hungarian Public Road Non-profit Ltd, a State-owned company – was taxed at the special rate of 75%. The amount concerned appears to have been 12,607,644 Hungarian forints. The applicant complains under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the measure which in his view was nothing else but disguised and unjustified deprivation of possession. He also argues that Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 was violated because only those dismissed from the public sector are subjected to the tax.
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possession within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, read alone or in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, R.Sz. v. Hungary, no. 41838/11, §§ 31 to 34 and §§ 54 to 62, 2 July 2013)?
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy