Published on 11 December 2023
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 52638/21
HİZMET İŞ SENDİKASI GENEL BAŞKANLIĞI
against Türkiye
lodged on 6 October 2021
communicated on 21 November 2023
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The application concerns the non-execution of a decision delivered by the Ankara 18th Labour Court, whereby the applicant union was awarded compensation to be paid by the Düziçi Municipality.
Relying on Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicant union complains about the continuing non‑execution of the final judicial decision awarding compensation.
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES
Has there been a violation of the applicant union’s right of access to court, guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and of its right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, on account of the authorities’ failure to execute the final judicial decision delivered by the Ankara 18th Labour Court (see Hornsby v. Greece, 19 March 1997, §§ 40-45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II; Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, §§ 65-87, ECHR 2009; and also Tetik and Others v. Turkey [Committee], nos. 25885/19 and 37 others, §§ 16-17, 15 March 2022)?
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy