Published on 28 August 2023
FIRST SECTION
Application no. 18490/22
Stanisław JAŹWIŃSKI against Poland
and 4 other applications
(see list appended)
communicated on 10 July 2023
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The applicants are judges or lawyers who applied for vacancies at different courts, or requested to continue serving as a judge beyond their retirement age. On various dates indicated in the table the National Council of the Judiciary (the “NCJ”) decided not to recommend the applicants for the judicial posts or otherwise dismissed their requests. The applicants appealed to the Supreme Court against the NCJ resolutions. On various dates the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court dismissed their appeals.
On each occasion the Chamber was composed of judges appointed to that court by the President of Poland on 10 October 2018, on recommendation of the NCJ (resolution no. 331/2018 of 28 August 2018) as established under the Amending Act on the NCJ and certain other statutes of 8 December 2017 (ustawa o zmianie ustawy o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa oraz niektórych innych ustaw; “the 2017 Act”).
The applicants complain that their cases were examined by the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court which was not an “independent and impartial tribunal established by law” within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES
Was the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court which dealt with the applicants’ cases an “independent and impartial tribunal established by law” as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?
Reference is made to the Court’s judgments in Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v. Poland, nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19, 8 November 2021, §§ 283-359 and Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland [GC], no. 26374/18, 1 December 2020, §§ 205-290.
APPENDIX
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant
Year of Birth
Place of Residence
Nationality
Represented by
Notes
1.
18490/22
Jaźwiński v. Poland
05/04/2022
Stanisław JAŹWIŃSKI
1955
Radom
Polish
Monika GĄSIOROWSKA
The applicant is a regional court’s judge who in 2019 requested to continue serving as a judge beyond his retirement age. The NCJ dismissed his requests on two occasions, but the resolutions were quashed by the Supreme Court upon the applicant’s appeals.
On 16/04/2021 the NCJ dismissed another request by the applicant to continue serving as a judge beyond his retirement age (resolution no. 442/2021).
On 01/12/2021 the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal (served on 04/02/2022, case no. I NKRS 80/21). It sat as a panel of three judges, composed of J. Lemańska, P. Czubik, M. Szczepaniec.
2.
25294/22
Żurek v. Poland (No 3)
09/05/2022
Waldemar ŻUREK
1970
Rzeplin
Polish
Sylwia GREGORCZYK-ABRAM
The applicant is a well-known judge who applied for a post at the Supreme Court.
On 12/05/21 the NCJ decided not to recommend the applicant (resolution no. 531/2021). The applicant appealed.
On 14/12/2021 the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs dismissed the applicant’s appeal (served on 20/12/2021, case no. I NKRS 68/21). It sat as a panel of three judges composed of K. Wiak, O. Nawrot, M Szczepaniec.
3.
30091/22
Fras v. Poland
10/06/2022
Mariusz FRAS
1970
Sosnowiec
Polish
Piotr KŁADOCZNY
The applicant is a lawyer who applied for a post at the Supreme Court. On 24/06/21 the NCJ decided not to recommend the applicant (resolution no. 764/2021). The applicant appealed against the resolution.
On 16/02/22 the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs dismissed the applicant’s appeal (served on 03/03/22, case no. I NKRS 129/21). It sat as a panel of three judges composed of O. Nawrot, J. Niczyporuk, P. Księżak.
4.
31638/22
Błachowicz v. Poland
15/06/2022
Bożena BŁACHOWICZ
1966
Przemyśl
Polish
Sylwia GREGORCZYK-ABRAM
The applicant is a judge at the Przemyśl Regional Court. In 2020 the applicant applied for a vacant post at the Rzeszów Court of Appeal.
On 11/12/2020 the NCJ decided not to recommend the applicant (resolution no. 954/2020). The applicant appealed.
On 01/12/2021 the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs dismissed the appeal (served on 17/12/2021, case no. I NKRS 81/21). It sat as a panel of three judges composed of J. Lemańska, M. Dobrowolski and M. Szczepaniec.
5.
36908/22
Czeszkiewicz v. Poland
07/07/2022
Dominik CZESZKIEWICZ
1978
Suwałki
Polish
Sylwia GREGORCZYK-ABRAM
The applicant is a judge at the Suwałki District Court. In 2021 he applied for a post at the Supreme Court. On 25/06/2021 the NCJ decided not to recommend the applicant (resolution no. 786/2021). The applicant appealed.
On 22/12/2021 the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs dismissed the appeal (served on 09/03/2022, case no. I NKRS 119/21).
It sat as a panel of three judges composed of T. Demendecki, J. Niczyporuk, K. Wiak.