FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
PILOT-JUDGMENT PROCEDURE
Application no. 7537/02
by Elżbieta JĘDRZEJUK
against Poland
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23 September 2008 as a Chamber composed of:
Nicolas Bratza, President,
Lech Garlicki,
Giovanni Bonello,
Ljiljana Mijović,
David Thór Björgvinsson,
Ján Šikuta,
Päivi Hirvelä, judges,
and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 21 February 2002,
Having regard to the decision to apply the pilot-judgment procedure and to adjourn its consideration of applications deriving from the same systemic problem identified in the case of Broniowski v. Poland (no. 31443/96),
Having regard to the decisions to strike the applications Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (no. 50003/99) and Witkowska-Toboła v. Poland (no. 11208/02) out of the Court’s list of cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
THE FACTS
The applicant, Ms Elżbieta Jędrzejuk, is a Polish national who was born in 1942 and lives in Siedlce.
A. Historical background to Bug River cases before the Court
(See E.G. v. Poland, no. 50425/99, §§ 2-5).
B. Particular circumstances of case no. 7537/02
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
On 26 July 2000 the Siedlce Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy) gave a declaratory judgment stating that the applicant’s parents had owned real property in the territories beyond the Bug River.
On 10 August 2001 the applicant obtained a certificate issued by the Mayor of Siedlce (Prezydent Miasta) confirming that the applicant’s mother, the applicant and their three relatives had the right to compensation for the property abandoned by their family, valued at 366,100.00 Polish zlotys (PLN) as of 30 July 1999.
The applicant’s subsequent attempts to acquire State property were unsuccessful. The only possibility of enforcing the claim was to participate in competitive bids for the sale of State property. However, the State authorities throughout Poland officially acknowledged the acute shortage of State-owned land designated for the realisation of the Bug River claims.
This fact and the fact that at the material time it was the authorities’ common practice to desist from organising auctions for Bug River claimants or to openly deny them the opportunity to enforce their entitlement through the statutory bidding procedure was established by the Court in the Broniowski judgment (see Broniowski, cited above, §§ 48-61, 69-87 and 168-176).
On 26 March 2007 the Mazowiecki Governor (Wojewoda) issued a document confirming, that the applicant had the right to compensation amounting to 20% of the current value of the original property, i.e. PLN 18,305.00. The date of the payment was not indicated.
C. Relevant domestic law and practice in respect of Bug River claims
(See E.G. v. Poland, no. 50425/99, §§ 16-17).
COMPLAINT
(See E.G. v. Poland, no. 50425/99, § 18).
THE LAW
(See E.G. v. Poland, no. 50425/99, §§ 19-29).
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
1. Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases;
2. Decides to close the pilot-judgment procedure applied in respect of the Bug River applications in the case of Broniowski v. Poland (no. 31443/96).
Lawrence EarlyNicolas Bratza
RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy