SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 8090/09
Mevludi JIOSHVILI against Russia
and 58 other applications
(see list appended)
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 19 October 2021 as a Chamber composed of:
Jon Fridrik Kjølbro, President,
Carlo Ranzoni,
Aleš Pejchal,
Dmitry Dedov,
Egidijus Kūris,
Pauliine Koskelo,
Marko Bošnjak, judges,
and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the Appendix,
Having regard to the decision of 24 August 2011 to give notice of the applications to the Russian Government (“the Government”) for information,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
THE FACTS
1. A list of the applicants, all of whom are Georgian nationals, and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the Appendix.
2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.
3. As a result of the armed conflict in August 2008 (see Georgia v. Russia (II) [GC], no. 38263/08, §§ 30-44, 21 January 2021), the applicants were forcibly displaced from their respective villages in South Ossetia and Abkhazia. To this day, they have no access to their homes and property.
COMPLAINTS
4. Relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, all the applicants complain that they have been displaced because of the August 2008 armed conflict and have been unable to access their homes and property. They also allege that their property was destroyed or damaged as a result of the hostilities, sometime between 8 and 12 August 2008.
5. All the applicants, except those in applications nos. 14681/09 and 47954/09, reiterate the complaint concerning their inability to access their homes and property (see the previous paragraph) (i) under Article 8 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 in respect of applications nos. 8153/09, 8204/09, 8525/09, 8538/09, 8554/09, 8603/09, 8799/09, 8912/09, 8989/09, 8996/09, 9218/09, 9239/09, 9891/09, 9913/09, 10046/09, 10341/09, 16518/09, 16574/09, 17296/09, 19795/09, 19810/09 and 52486/09; and (ii) only under Article 8 of the Convention in respect of applications nos. 8090/09, 8104/09, 8121/09, 8129/09, 8133/09, 8135/09, 8145/09, 8154/09, 8168/09, 8180/09, 8182/09, 8202/09, 8228/09, 8233/09, 8237/09, 8239/09, 8240/09, 8262/09, 8375/09, 8724/09, 9000/09, 9035/09, 9089/09, 9099/09, 9465/09, 19779/09, 20397/09, 20828/09, 22334/09, 22528/09, 25906/09, 25965/09, 26010/09, 26674/09 and 45691/09.
6. All the applicants – except those in applications nos. 14681/09, 45691/09 and 47954/09 – complain under Article 14 of the Convention that they have been discriminated against, on the basis of their ethnicity, in the enjoyment of their rights under the Convention.
7. All the applicants – except those mentioned in paragraph 6 above and those in application no. 19810/09 – also complain of not having been provided with an effective remedy in respect of their various complaints, as required by Article 13 of the Convention.
8. Relying on Article 2 of the Convention, the applicants in applications nos. 8090/09, 8104/09, 8121/09, 8129/09, 8133/09, 8135/09, 8145/09, 8153/09, 8154/09, 8168/09, 8180/09, 8182/09, 8202/09, 8204/09, 8228/09, 8233/09, 8237/09, 8239/09, 8240/09, 8262/09, 8375/09, 8525/09, 8538/09, 8603/09, 8912/09, 9089/09, 9239/09, 9891/09, 16574/09, 17296/09, 19795/09 and 47954/09 complained, in generic terms and without submitting evidence regarding the extent to which they or their relatives had been affected, about the active phase of hostilities and (i) the alleged risk to their relatives’ and their own lives during the hostilities between 8 and 12 August 2008; (ii) the injuries allegedly received during that period; and/or (iii) the death of relatives.
9. The substance of the complaints under Article 2 of the Convention (see paragraph 8 above) was also raised under Article 3 of the Convention in applications nos. 8135/09, 8153/09, 8204/09, 8538/09, 8603/09, 8799/09, 8912/09, 8989/09, 8996/09, 9000/09, 9218/09, 9239/09, 9891/09, 9913/09, 10046/09, 10341/09, 17296/09, 19779/09, 19795/09, 20397/09, 20828/09, 22334/09, 22528/09, 25906/09, 25965/09, 26010/09, 26674/09 and 52486/09. Various applicants in the latter group of applications further alleged, without submitting evidence regarding the extent to which they might have been affected, that they had watched their homes burn while fleeing the hostilities. The applicants in application no. 9000/09 also complained of having been detained in poor conditions and having been subjected to ill-treatment during their detention.
10. The applicants in applications nos. 8204/09, 8799/09 and 8996/09 complained – without submitting evidence regarding their whereabouts or the extent to which they might have been affected – of having been unlawfully detained at different points in time in August 2008, in breach of Article 5 of the Convention. The applicants in application no. 9000/09 submitted that they had been detained in Tskhinvali and had been victims of forced labour, in breach of Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. The first applicant in the same application submitted a poorly legible copy of a detainee identification document issued by the International Committee of the Red Cross to an individual under a different name and year of birth, explaining that he had given a false name at the time, out of fear of reprisals owing to his Ossetian ethnicity. The applicants in application no. 19810/09 complained, under Articles 5 and 7 of the Convention, of the potential risk of detention if they were to return to their village.
THE LAW
Joinder of the applications11. Given their similar factual and legal background, the Court decides that the present fifty-nine applications (see the Appendix) should be joined pursuant to Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court.
General considerations12. The Court reiterates its findings reached in the inter-State case of Georgia v. Russia (II) ([GC], no. 38263/08, §§ 125-44 and 162-75, 21 January 2021) and in Dzhioyeva and Others v. Georgia ((dec.), nos. 24964/09, 20548/09 and 22469/09, §§ 23-30, 20 November 2018), Naniyeva and Bagayev v. Georgia ((dec.), nos. 2256/09 and 2260/09, §§ 19‑26, 20 November 2018) and Kudukhova v. Georgia ((dec.), nos. 8274/09 and 8275/09, §§ 21-28, 20 November 2018). Those findings also apply to the present applications, in so far as relevant.
Complaints under Articles 8, 13 and 14 of the Convention, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 2 of Protocol No. 413. Relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, all the applicants argue that as a result of the armed conflict, their homes and other property were damaged and/or destroyed. They also complain that they were forced to flee their respective villages and, to date, have been unable to return.
14. Some of the applicants reiterated their complaint regarding their alleged inability to access their homes and property under Article 8 of the Convention and/or Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (see paragraph 5 above).
15. Furthermore, various applicants complain under Article 13 of the Convention of the absence of an effective domestic remedy for their grievances and under Article 14 of having suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights (see paragraphs 6-7 above).
16. In support of their allegations, the applicants provided the Court with various items of prima facie evidence. In particular, the majority of the applicants submitted certificates issued by local authorities indicating their ownership of property. Other applicants submitted extracts from the Public Registry confirming the registration of their respective property rights. One applicant submitted a tenancy agreement in relation to a plot of land. Various other materials were also submitted, such as identification documents indicating residence in the respective villages, confirmation of the status of an internally displaced person, and/or local authorities’ confirmation of residence in the villages concerned.
17. The relevant provisions relied on by the applicants read as follows:
Article 1 of Protocol No. 1
“Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law.
...”
Article 8 of the Convention
“1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”
Article 13 of the Convention
“Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.”
Article 14 of the Convention
“The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.”
18. At the outset, and in so far as the applicants complain regarding the alleged destruction of and/or damage to their property as a result of the hostilities, the Court reiterates its findings in the inter-State case of Georgia v. Russia (II) (cited above, § 144) that the events which occurred during the active phase of the hostilities (8 to 12 August 2008) did not fall within the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation for the purposes of Article 1 of the Convention. On that basis it declares inadmissible, in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention, this limb of the applicants’ complaints.
19. As to the complaints regarding the applicants’ alleged inability to access their homes and property, the Court can accept, on the basis of the prima facie evidence submitted by them (see paragraph 16 above), that the applicants could have been adversely affected by the events of the conflict in question. The relevant circumstances, as described by the applicants, may, according to the Court’s case-law, engage Articles 8, 13 and 14 of the Convention, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and/or Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (see Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167/06, §§ 219-26 and §§ 252-61, ECHR 2015, and Georgia v. Russia (II), cited above, §§ 292-98).
20. The Court considers that it cannot, on the basis of the case file, determine the admissibility of the applicants’ complaints relating to their alleged inability to access their homes and property. It is therefore necessary, in accordance with Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, to give notice of this part of the applications (see paragraph 19 above) to the respondent Government.
Complaints under Article 5 of the Convention21. The Court takes note of the complaints made by several applicants under Article 5 of the Convention (see paragraph 10 above).
22. It observes that only the first applicant in application no. 9000/09 submitted evidence in support of the allegation of having been detained in Tskhinvali. However, that document indicated a different name and year of birth from those of the applicant concerned. In the absence of any other corroborating evidence, the Court cannot take at face value the applicant’s explanation of his having given a false name to avoid negative repercussions based on his Ossetian ethnicity. The complaint is therefore unsubstantiated and must be rejected as manifestly ill-founded, in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.
23. As regards the remaining complaints under Article 5, in view of the absence of any evidence to substantiate them, the Court finds them to be manifestly ill-founded. They must likewise be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.
Other complaints24. The Court takes note of the complaints under Articles 2, 3, 4 and 7 of the Convention raised by several applicants (see paragraphs 8-10 above).
25. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within the Court’s competence, these complaints do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.
26. It follows that this part of the applications is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to adjourn the examination of the applicants’ complaints under Article 8 of the Convention, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 in so far as their alleged inability to access their homes and property is concerned, and of the complaints under Articles 13 and 14 of the Convention, where relevant;
Declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible.
Done in English and notified in writing on 18 November 2021.
{signature_p_2}
Hasan Bakırcı Jon Fridrik Kjølbro
Deputy Registrar President
Appendix
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant
Year of birth
Place of residence before August 2008
Represented by
8090/09
Jioshvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Mevludi JIOSHVILI
1967
Kurta Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8104/09
Sopio Gogidze v. Russia
08/02/2009
Sopio GOGIDZE
1977
Zemo Achabeti Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8121/09
Gochashvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Lavrenti GOCHASHVILI
1950
Kheiti Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8129/09
Iveri Gochashvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Iveri GOCHASHVILI
1990
Kheiti Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8133/09
Chovelidze v. Russia
08/02/2009
Ilia CHOVELIDZE
1970
Achabeti Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8135/09
Durglishvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Bagrati DURGLISHVILI
1952
Avnevi Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8145/09
Kakhniashvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Kristo KAKHNIASHVILI
1949
Kurta Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8153/09
Bugianishvili and Others v. Russia
06/02/2009
1. Vazha BUGIANISHVILI
1956
Kheiti Village
2. Otari GOCHASHVILI
1949
Kheiti Village
3. Badri GOCHASHVILI
1971
Kheiti Village
Mr N. Legashvili
8154/09
Gherkenashvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Teimurazi GHERKENASHVILI
1956
Kurta Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8168/09
Melanashvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Nona MELANASHVILI
1971
Kekhvi Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8180/09
Ivane Babutsidze v. Russia
08/02/2009
Ivane BABUTSIDZE
1925
Achabeti Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8182/09
Giorgi Babutsidze v. Russia
08/02/2009
Giorgi BABUTSIDZE
1965
Achabeti Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8202/09
Givi Babutsidze v. Russia
08/02/2009
Givi BABUTSIDZE
1936
Achabeti Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8204/09
Gogidze and Others v. Russia
06/02/2009
1. Lova GOGIDZE
1962
Dzartsemi Village
2. Mamuka MAISURADZE
1974
Dzartsemi Village
3. Kakha METREVELI
1974
Dzartsemi Village
4. Mikheil GOGIDZE
1930
Dzartsemi Village
5. Savjenko GUNDISHVILI
1954
Dzartsemi Village
6. Zhenia MAISURADZE
1926
Dzartsemi Village
7. Mania GUNDISHVILI
1979
Dzartsemi Village
8. Sandro GUNDISHVILI
1982
Dzartsemi Village
9. Kakha MAISURADZE
1969
Dzartsemi Village
10. Beglari GOGIDZE
1947
Dzartsemi Village
11. Elo GOGIDZE
1930
Dzartsemi Village
12. Davit GOGIDZE
1961
Dzartsemi Village
13. Khvicha GOGIDZE
1967
Dzartsemi Village
14. Kolia CHOVELIDZE
1960
Dzartsemi Village
15. Tarieli METREVELI
1954
Dzartsemi Village
16. Izolda OTINASHVILI
1940
Dzartsemi Village
17. Aleksandre GOGIDZE
1958
Dzartsemi Village
Mr. N. Legashvili
8228/09
Kvrivishvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Tina KVRIVISHVILI
1968
Achabeti Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8233/09
Dali Jioshvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Dali JIOSHVILI
1947
Kurta Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8237/09
Megrelishvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Megi MEGRELISHVILI
1972
Zemo Achabeti Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8239/09
Lapachi v. Russia
08/02/2009
Nana LAPACHI
1967
Kurta Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8240/09
Marine Kakhniashvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Marine KAKHNIASHVILI
1963
Nuli Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8262/09
Zangaladze v. Russia
08/02/2009
Nora ZANGALADZE
1936
Kekhvi Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8375/09
Roin Babutsidze v. Russia
08/02/2009
Roini BABUTSIDZE
1965
Achabeti Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8525/09
Khetagashvili and Others v. Russia
06/02/2009
1. Kristo KHETAGASHVILI
1949
Sveri Village
2. Emzar KHETAGASHVILI
1979
Kemerti Village
3. Evgenia PAPELISHVILI
1940
Sveri Village
Mr N. Legashvili
8538/09
Shoshitashvili and Others v. Russia
06/02/2009
1. Ramaz SHOSHITASHVILI
1966
Ksuisi Village
The applicant died on 4 April 2010; his wife, Tsisana Vazagovi, expressed her wish to pursue the application.
2. Klimenti VAZAGOVI
1948
Ksuisi Village
3. Maia SHERAZADISHVILI
1966
Ksuisi Village
4. Emzar SHOSHITASHVILI
1970
Ksuisi Village
Mr N. Legashvili
8554/09
Mindiashvili and Others v. Russia
06/02/2009
1. Giorgi MINDIASHVILI
1942
Kemerti Village
2. Mania KASRADZE
1958
Kemerti Village
3. Akaki GHERKENASHVILI
1956
Kemerti Village
4. Aleko OTINASHVILI
1980
Kemerti Village
5. Vano OTINASHVILI
1975
Kemerti Village
6. Tamaz KASRADZE
1977
Kemerti Village
7. Nugzar KAULASHVILI
1963
Kemerti Village
8. Roini GHERKENASHVILI
1953
Kemerti Village
9. Nikoloz OTINASHVILI
1948
Kemerti Village
10. Nugzar KASRADZE
1971
Kemerti Village
11. Elguja KASRADZE
1940
Kemerti Village
12. Nukri KASRADZE
1968
Kemerti Village
13. Dali GOCHASHVILI
1956
Kemerti Village
14. Guram OTINASHVILI
1970
Kemerti Village
15. Gela OTINASHVILI
1963
Kemerti Village
16. Khvicha OTINASHVILI
1969
Kemerti Village
17. Jondo KASRADZE
1960
Kemerti Village
18. Rusiko MAGHALDADZE
1930
Kemerti Village
19. Data OTINASHVILI
1954
Kemerti Village
20. Badri GHERKENASHVILI
1966
Kemerti Village
21. Zaza OTINASHVILI
1978
Kemerti Village
22. Rezo KASRADZE
1957
Kemerti Village
23. Zurab OTINASHVILI
1969
Kemerti Village
24. Guram KAULASHVILI
1939
Kemerti Village
25. Zurab KAULASHVILI
1966
Kemerti Village
26. Omar GHERKENASHVILI
1969
Kemerti Village
27. Zurab METREVELI
1969
Kemerti Village
Mr N. Legashvili
8603/09
Kakhniashvili and Others v. Russia
06/02/2009
At the material time, all the applicants were residents of the Kekhvi Village
1. Nina KAKHNIASHVILI
1935
2. Nodar KAKHNIASHVILI
1965
3. Nugzar KAKHNIASHVILI
1962
4. Bichiko BLIADZE
1979
5. Malkhaz MELANASHVILI
1962
6. Gusein MELANASHVILI
1938
7. Koba MELANASHVILI
1971
8. Ivane MELANASHVILI
1963
9. Tamar KAPANADZE
1959
10. Kristepore NEBIERIDZE
1965
11. Korneli KAKHNIASHVILI
1941
12. Rezo ZANGALADZE
1929
13. Levan KAKHNIASHVILI
1961
14. Genadi KAKHNIASHVILI
1951
15. Nikoloz MELANASHVILI
1973
16. Mamuka MELANASHVILI
1972
Mr N. Legashvili
8724/09
Terashvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Irina TERASHVILI
1958
Beloti Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
8799/09
Shoshitashvili v. Russia
09/02/2009
Revaz SHOSHITASHVILI
1966
Ksuisi Village
Ms J. Evans
8912/09
Zubashvili and Others v. Russia
09/02/2009
1. Zaur ZUBASHVILI
1946
Kheiti Village
2. Tamaz KULICHISHVILI
1960
Kheiti Village
The applicant died on 19 September 2012;
his wife expressed her wish
to pursue the application. The case-file material does not include any documents demonstrating kinship.
3. Giorgi KULICHISHVILI
1953
Kheiti Village
Ms J. Evans
8989/09
Shoshitashvili and Others v. Russia
09/02/2009
1. Revaz SHOSHITASHVILI
1933
Ksuisi Village
2. Opelia SHOSHITASHVILI
1957
Ksuisi Village
3. Ioseb SHOSHITASHVILI
1967
Ksuisi Village
The applicant died on 19 September 2012;
his wife expressed her wish
to pursue the application.
Ms J. Evans
8996/09
Askilashvili and Others v. Russia
09/02/2009
1. Ilia ASKILASHVILI
1934
Atsriskhevi Village
2. Gocha ASKILASHVILI
1972
Atsriskhevi Village
3. Jemal VAZAGASHVILI
1952
Atsriskhevi Village
4. Givi ASKILASHVILI
1956
Atsriskhevi Village
Ms J. Evans
9000/09
Jioevi and Kakhniashvili v. Russia
06/02/2009
1. Aslani JIOEVI
1949
Kekhvi Village
2. Nikolozi KAKHNIASHVILI
1932
Kekhvi Village
Ms V. Jijelava
9035/09
Chulukhadze and Others v. Russia
06/02/2009
1. Vladimer CHULUKHADZE
1958
Zemo Achabeti Village
2. Roman ZOZIASHVILI
1942
Zemo Achabeti Village
3. Salome KALIASHVILI
1987
Zemo Achabeti Village
4. Jimsheri BABUTSIDZE
1953
Zemo Achabeti Village
5. Bela CHULUKHADZE
1969
Zemo Achabeti Village
6. Bagrat TSERTSVADZE
1982
Zemo Achabeti Village
Ms V. Jijelava
9089/09
Davit Babutsidze and Others v. Russia
06/02/2009
1. Davit BABUTSIDZE
1978
Kvemo Achabeti Village
2. Elene ROMELASHVILI
1950
Kvemo Achabeti Village
3. Tamar CHULUKHADZE
1971
Kvemo Achabeti Village
Ms V. Jijelava
9099/09
Begheluri v. Russia
06/02/2009
Aleksandre BEGHELURI
1930
Disevi Village
Ms V. Jijelava
9218/09
Maraneli and Others v. Russia
09/02/2009
1. Tania TASOEVA
1937
Avnevi Village
2. Zaira MARANELI
1954
Avnevi Village
3. Gurgen DURGLISHVILI
1935
Avnevi Village
Ms J. Evans
9239/09
Nebieridze and Others v. Russia
09/02/2009
1. Almiza NEBIERIDZE
1936
Kekhvi Village
Following the death of the applicant, his daughter expressed her wish to pursue the application. The case-file material does not include any documents demonstrating kinship.
2. Nazi BERUASHVILI
1949
Kekhvi Village
3. Suliko MELANASHVILI
1934
Kekhvi Village
4. Merab KASRADZE
1953
Kekhvi Village
5. Malkhaz KAKHNIASHVILI
1959
Kekhvi Village
6. Vladimer KAKHNIASHVILI
1933
Kekhvi Village
7. Koba KAKHNIASHVILI
1968
Kekhvi Village
8. Bidzina KAKHNIASHVILI
1964
Kekhvi Village
Ms J. Evans
9465/09
Gherkenashvili and Others v. Russia
06/02/2009
1. Maia GHERKENASHVILI
1972
Kekhvi Village
2. Mzevinar KAKHNIASHVILI
1963
Kekhvi Village
3. Mzia NEBIERIDZE
1964
Kekhvi Village
4. Nodar MELANASHVILI
1957
Kekhvi Village
Ms Ts. Javakhishvili
9891/09
Gochashvili v. Russia
11/02/2009
1. Eliko GOCHASHVILI
1952
Kheiti Village
2. Akaki GOCHASHVILI
1951
Kheiti Village
Mr N. Legashvili
9913/09
Datashvili and Others v. Russia
13/02/2009
At the material time, all the applicants were residents of the Tamarasheni Village
1. Venera DATASHVILI
1938
Following the death of the applicant, her daughter expressed her wish to pursue the application. The case-file material does not include any documents demonstrating kinship.
2. Guram KHETERELI
1934
Following the death of the applicant, his daughter expressed her wish to pursue the application. The case-file material does not include any documents demonstrating kinship.
3. Vasil GOGIDZE
1970
4. Gaioz GOGIDZE
1943
5. Ana DATASHVILI
1935
6. Aleksi NASUASHVILI
1928
Following the death of the applicant, his wife expressed her wish to pursue the application. The case-file material does not include any documents demonstrating kinship.
7. Eter NASUASHVILI
1928
8. Alexandre DATASHVILI
1965
9. Merab NASUASHVILI
1950
10. Vladimer DATASHVILI
1985
11. Emzari DATASHVILI
1961
12. Dali GIUNASHVILI
1973
13. Tsira DATASHVILI
1948
14. David DZADZAMIA
1977
15. Maia SANAKOEVA
1968
16. Ivane GOGIDZE
1962
17. Zakhar GOGIDZE
1930
18. Kartlos DATASHVILI
1947
19. Valia AIDARASHVILI
1945
20. Koba TABATADZE
1966
21. Levan KUSIANI
1938
22. Davit ELBAKIDZE
1971
23. Lamara OTINASHVILI
1956
24. Guram DATASHVILI
1933
25. Giorgi DATASHVILI
1981
Mr E. Wesselink, Russian Justice Initiative
10046/09
Tsitsiloshvili v. Russia
10/02/2009
Ramaz TSITSILOSHVILI
1955
Vanati Village
Ms T. Dekanosidze
10341/09
Beruashvili and Others v. Russia
17/02/2009
1. Iason BERUASHVILI
1931
Berula Village
2. Elene BERUASHVILI
1928
Berula Village
3. Mevlud BERUASHVILI
1960
Berula Village
4. Seriozha BERUASHVILI
1957
Berula Village
5. Roland BERUASHVILI
1959
Berula Village
6. Givi BERUASHVILI
1947
Berula Village
7. Gia BERUASHVILI
1960
Berula Village
8. Elguja BERUASHVILI
1955
Berula Village
9. Guram BERUASHVILI
1956
Berula Village
10. Nunu BERUASHVILI
1942
Berula Village
11. Amiran MAISURADZE
1956
Berula Village
12. Tamaz ARCHUADZE
1957
Berula Village
13. Dimitri BERUASHVILI
1942
Berula Village
14. Vepkhia BERUASHVILI
1969
Berula Village
15. Mikheil VAKHTANGASHVILI
1926
Berula Village
16. Giorgi VAKHTANGASHVILI
1958
Berula Village
17. Ia OZGEBISHVILI
1973
Berula Village
18. Maro VAKHTANGASHVILI
1925
Berula Village
19. Nugzar VAKHTANGASHVILI
1950
Berula Village
20. Davit OTINASHVILI
1970
Berula Village
21. Alexander MAISURADZE
1964
Berula Village
22. Nino BERUASHVILI
1945
Berula Village
The case file contains a
supplementary list of applicants with additional names.
What link these additional names had to the application was not clarified.
Ms J. Evans
14681/09
Basishvili v. Russia
10/02/2009
Grigol BASISHVILI
1979
Kurta Village
N/A
16518/09
Khaduri and Others v. Russia
20/03/2009
1. Tamara KHADURI
1935
Berula Village
The applicant died on 5 July 2013; her grandson expressed his wish to
pursue the application. The case-file material does not include any documents demonstrating kinship.
2. Zurabi KHADURI
1987
Berula Village
3. Tariel BERUASHVILI
1957
Berula Village
4. Elnari VAKHTANGASHVILI
1951
Berula Village
Ms J. Evans
16574/09
Tsotniashvili v. Russia
20/03/2009
Ivlite TSOTNIASHVILI
1938
Eredvi Village
Ms J. Evans
17296/09
Datashvili v. Russia
08/02/2009
Zakaria DATASHVILI
1946
1946
Tamarasheni Village
Mr B. Botchorishvili
19779/09
Balashvili v. Russia
12/02/2009
Merab BALASHVILI
1950
Akhalgori
N/A
19795/09
Beruashvili v. Russia
02/03/2009
Sonia BERUASHVILI
1927
Berula Village
Mr N. Legashvili
19810/09
Iamze and Zaza Machabelli v. Russia
15/02/2009
1. Iamze MACHABELLI
1963
Tbilisi/Kurta Village
2. Zaza MACHABELLI
1964
Tbilisi/Kurta Village
Mr B. Maghradze
20397/09
Merab Beruashvili and Others v. Russia
17/02/2009
1. Merab BERUASHVILI
1947
Eredvi Village
2. Beglar BOTSVADZE
1941
Mamisaantubani Village
3. Irma MESHVILDISHVILI
1964
Village Berula
4. Koba BOTSVADZE
1980
Mamisaantubani Village
5. Grunia ODIKADZE
1947
Gori
Mr E. Paksadze
20828/09
Kekelishvili and Others v. Russia
17/02/2009
1. Tariel KEKELISHVILI
1946
Kheiti Village
2. Guram KULICHISHVILI
1955
Kheiti Village
3. Gela KEKELISHVILI
1960
Kheiti Village
4. Zaza SHERAZADASHVILI
1967
Kheiti Village
5. Mamuka KEKELISHVILI
1971
Kheiti Village
Mr E. Paksadze
22334/09
Zangaladze and Others v. Russia
17/02/2009
1. Mamuka ZANGALADZE
1974
Kekhvi Village
2. Mamuka NEBIERIDZE
1971
Kekhvi Village
3. Natela NEBIERIDZE
1946
Kekhvi Village
4. Merab ZANGALADZE
1949
Kekhvi Village
5. Teimuraz NEBIERIDZE
1956
Kekhvi Village
6. Ramaz GHONGHADZE
1965
Kekhvi Village
7. Teimuraz KAKHNIASHVILI
1947
Kekhvi Village
8. Otar KAKHNIASHVILI
1949
Kekhvi Village
Mr E. Paksadze
22528/09
Nikorashvili v. Russia
17/02/2009
Narimand NIKORASHVILI
1951
Prisi Village
Mr E. Paksadze
25906/09
Ketevan Nikolishvili v. Russia
17/02/2009
Ketevan NIKOLISHVILI
1928
Vanati Village
Mr E. Paksadze
25965/09
Tchovelidze and Others v. Russia
17/02/2009
1. Elizbar TCHOVELIDZE
1963
Dzartsemi Village
Georgian
2. Ioseb METREVELI
1960
Dzartsemi Village
3. Vakhtang METREVELI
1931
Dzartsemi Village
4. Zurab METREVELI
1951
Dzartsemi Village
5. Alik TCHOVELIDZE
1977
Dzartsemi Village
6. Goderdzi TCHOVELIDZE
1980
Dzartsemi Village
7. Vazha TCHOVELIDZE
1958
Dzartsemi Village
8. Arsen TCHOVELIDZE
1932
Dzartsemi Village
Mr E. Paksadze
26010/09
Guram Otinashvili and Others v. Russia
17/02/2009
1. Guram OTINASHVILI
1946
Kemerti Village
2. Teimuraz BERUASHVILI
1958
Kemerti Village
3. Severian KASRADZE
1931
Kemerti Village
4. Tengiz KASRADZE
1949
Kemerti Village
5. Kristo KASRADZE
1947
Kemerti Village
6. Natela METREVELI
1930
Kemerti Village
7. Mikheil KASRADZE
1957
Kemerti Village
8. Vazha KASRADZE
1954
Kemerti Village
9. Morisi GHERKENASHVILI
1970
Kemerti Village
10. Akaki METREVELI
1957
Kemerti Village
11. Ivane OTINASHVILI
1941
Kemerti Village
12. Vaso OTINASHVILI
1977
Kemerti Village
13. Vazha METREVELI
1953
Kemerti Village
14. Jemal METREVELI
1962
Kemerti Village
15. Emzar MINDIASHVILI
1967
Kemerti Village
16. Givi METREVELI
1959
Kemerti Village
17. Anzor KASRADZE
1965
Kemerti Village
18. Zurab KASRADZE
1968
Kemerti Village
19. Gia METREVELI
1974
Kemerti Village
20. Ramaz OTINASHVILI
1987
Kemerti Village
21. Tamaz OTINASHVILI
1956
Kemerti Village
22. Levan OTINASHVILI
1959
Kemerti Village
23. Guram Otinashvili
1946
Kemerti Village
24. Elene ZAALISHVILI
1945
Kemerti Village
25. Leri GHERKENASHVILI
1963
Kemerti Village
26. Parven METREVELI
1939
Gori
Georgian
27. Zurab OTINASHVILI
1982
Kemerti Village
28. Temur OTINASHVILI
1992
Kemerti Village
29. Vladimer OTINASHVILI
1925
Kemerti Village
30. Daro MAGHALDADZE
1936
Kemerti Village
31. Elo KASRADZE
1929
Kemerti Village
32. Aleksandre KASRADZE
1954
Kemerti Village
33. Genari KASRADZE
1974
Kemerti Village
Mr E. Paksadze
26674/09
Nasuashvili and Others v. Russia
17/02/2009
1. Shalva NASUASHVILI
1972
Tamarasheni Village
2. Mamuka NASUASHVILI
1968
Tamarasheni Village
3. Vera NASUASHVILI
1938
Tamarasheni Village
4. Rusudan GOCHASHVIILI
1985
Tamarasheni Village
5. Jemal MINDIASHVILI
1942
Tamarasheni Village
6. Malkhaz KHUBULOVI
1970
Tamarasheni Village
7. Zurab TCHOVELIDZE
1957
Tamarasheni Village
8. Maia KAKHNIASHVILI
1966
Tamarasheni Village
Mr E. Paksadze
45691/09
Maghaldadze v. Russia
22/01/2009
1. Ramin MAGHALDADZE
1980
Kemerti Village
2. Vladimer MAGHALDADZE
1946
Kemerti Village
N/A
47954/09
Maruashvili v. Russia
03/08/2009
Liana MARUASHVILI
1959
Ptishi Village
N/A
52486/09
Turashvili and Others v. Russia
10/02/2009
1. Tristan TURASHVILI
1943
Argvitsi Village
2. Vakhtang ASKILASHVILI
1930
Argvitsi Village
3. Zuriko MIDODASHVILI
1965
Argvitsi Village
4. Nona GIGUASHVILI
1973
Argvitsi Village
5. Valeri MIDODASHVILI
1954
Argvitsi Village
6. Gia MIDODASHVILI
1962
Argvitsi Village
7. Durmishkhan MIDODASHVILI
1956
Argvitsi Village
8. Vazha MIDODASHVILI
1965
Argvitsi Village
9. Zuriko ROMELASHVILI
1967
Argvitsi Village
Ms J. Evans