Published on 17 July 2023
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 22188/19
Bayram Ali KARABÜBER against Türkiye
and 5 other applications
(see list appended)
communicated on 28 June 2023
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The applications concern the refusal of the domestic authorities to grant the applicants, who were detained at the time of the events, permission to receive visits from their school-age children during the weekends.
Application no. 15504/20 also concerns the authorities’ refusal to allow telephone calls at weekends.
The applicants complain of a violation of their rights under Article 8 of the Convention.
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES
1. Has there been an interference with the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life and correspondence, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, on account of the impugned restrictions on weekend visits and telephone calls (see Subaşı and Others v. Türkiye, nos. 3468/20 and 18 others, §§ 77-79 and 105, 6 December 2022)?
2. If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2 of the Convention? In particular, did the domestic authorities make a concrete assessment of the applicants’ needs and engage with their complaints in accordance with the guarantees inherent in Article 8 of the Convention (ibid., §§ 80-93 and 106‑09)?
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant
Year of Birth
Represented by
1.
22188/19
Karabüber v. Türkiye
15/04/2019
Bayram Ali KARABÜBER
1980
2.
23977/19
Atça v. Türkiye
27/04/2019
Zekeriya ATÇA
1980
3.
5855/20
Akpınar v. Türkiye
31/12/2019
Yusuf Ziya AKPINAR
1977
Türkan AKPINAR (not lawyer)
4.
8741/20
Baykuş v. Türkiye
16/01/2020
Göksel BAYKUŞ
1970
5.
13773/20
Küçüka v. Türkiye
07/02/2020
Ender KÜÇÜKA
1982
6.
15504/20
Eroğlu v. Türkiye
11/03/2020
Fatih EROĞLU
1975