FIFTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 52282/10
Beglar KHADURI
against Georgia
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 13 February 2018 as a Committee composed of:
Yonko Grozev, President,
Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer,
Lado Chanturia, judges,
and Anne-Marie Dougin, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 28 July 2010,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
1. The applicant, Mr Beglar Khaduri, is a Georgian national, who was born in 1950 and lives in Tbilisi. He was represented before the Court by Ms L. Mukhashavria, a lawyer practising in Tbilisi.
2. The applicant’s complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 concerning the non-enforcement of a final domestic decision were communicated to the Georgian Government (“the Government”) on 14 September 2016. The Government were represented by their Agent, Mr B. Dzamashvili, of the Ministry of Justice.
3. On 15 May 2017 the applicant’s representative informed the Court that, since her client had not been answering her telephone calls nor willing to communicate with her in any other manner, he had apparently lost interest in the proceedings. She stated that, in such circumstances, she was no longer able to represent his interests in a meaningful manner.
4. The applicant further failed to respond to the Registry’s last letter of 19 June 2017, which had been served on his domestic address on 24 June 2017, reminding him that the period allowed for submission of his observations in reply had expired on 30 May 2017 and that no extension of time had been requested. His attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.
THE LAW
5. The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.
6. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 8 March 2018.
Anne-Marie DouginYonko Grozev
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy