THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 12482/24
Jolanda KOELLA
against Slovenia
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 4 September 2025 as a Committee composed of:
Úna Ní Raifeartaigh, President,
Mateja Đurović,
Vasilka Sancin, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 24 April 2024,
Having regard to the declaration submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases, and the applicant’s reply to this declaration,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table.
The applicant was represented by Odvetniška družba Gregorovič, Dobrajc, Mlinarič o.p., d.o.o., a law firm from Šentjur.
The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the length of the enforcement proceedings were communicated to the Slovenian Government (“the Government”). Complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Government submitted a declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the application.
The Government acknowledged that in the particular circumstances of this case the length of the enforcement proceedings has been in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. They further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicant’s rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicant the amount detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amount would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above-mentioned three‑month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
The applicant informed the Court that she agreed to the terms of the declaration.
THE LAW
The Court finds that, following the applicant’s express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.
It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 25 September 2025.
Viktoriya Maradudina Úna Ní Raifeartaigh
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(delayed enforcement of a domestic judgment)
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant
(in euros)[1]
12482/24
24/04/2024
Jolanda KOELLA
1958
Odvetniška družba Gregorovič, Dobrajc, Mlinarič o.p., d.o.o.
Šentjur
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law to complain about the excessive length of the enforcement proceedings
31/03/2025
23/04/2025
10,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.