THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Applications nos. 43305/19 and 3762/20
Maksim Valeryevich KULIBIN against Russia
and Denis Mikhaylovich KISLITSIN against Russia
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 17 December 2020 as a Committee composed of:
Darian Pavli, President,
Dmitry Dedov,
Peeter Roosma, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In application no. 43305/19 complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see the appended table).
The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.
The Government acknowledged the excessive length of pre-trial detention. In application no. 43305/19 they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicant’s rights guaranteed by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above‑mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.
It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 21 January 2021.
_p_1} {signature_p_2}
Liv TigerstedtDarian Pavli
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention
(excessive length of pre-trial detention)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Other complaints under well‑established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
43305/19
06/08/2019
Maksim Valeryevich KULIBIN
1989
Romanov Aleksey Andreyevich
Moscow
Art. 5 (4) - deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention - appeal against the detention order of the Meshchanskiy District Court of Moscow of 22/01/2019
(upheld on appeal by the Moscow City Court on 21/03/2019).
18/03/2020
15/07/2020
4,700
3762/20
25/12/2019
Denis Mikhaylovich KISLITSIN
1992
Kiryanov Aleksandr Vladimirovich
Taganrog
14/08/2020
12/10/2020
1,050
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy