Published on 8 January 2024
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 42576/21
Natalya Anatolyevna LONGINOVA against Russia
and 20 other applications
(see list appended)
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 30 November 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.
In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).
For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website.
SUBJECT MATTER
The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).
APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal offence
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under
well-established case-law
42576/21*
12/08/2021
Natalya Anatolyevna LONGINOVA
1995
Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Yakutsk
23/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Sakha Republic
26/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021- Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and
8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine the police officers on whose written statements her conviction was based
43766/21*
23/08/2021
Nigmatulla Musayevich NIGMATULLIN
1998
Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Omsk
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Omsk Regional Court
06/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
43924/21*
23/08/2021
Timofey Alekseyevich BEREZIN
1997
Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Surgut
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Court of the Khanty-Mansy Autonomous Region
06/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and
8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
45015/21*
03/09/2021
Azat Anvarovich MANSUROV
1995
Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings
45018/21*
03/09/2021
Darya Alekseyevna SIBILEVA
1998
Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Ryazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
20 hours of community work
Ryazan Regional Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
46215/21*
10/09/2021
Yelena Viktorovna TABULOVICH
1972
Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Tomsk
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 13,000
Tomsk Regional Court
23/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
49678/21
17/09/2021
Tatyana Gennadyevna KOROVINA
1955
Ernest Aleksandrovich Mezak
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000
Supreme Court of the Republic of Komi
17/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
50627/21*
29/09/2021
Andrey Alekseyevich KOLESOV
1994
Marina Alekseyevna Dubrovina
Novorossiysk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Novorossiysk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
29/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
56958/21*
19/11/2021
Aleksandr Nikolayevich LUCHNIKOV
1991
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Perm
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Perm Regional Court
31/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
56969/21*
19/11/2021
Aleksandr Sergeyevich ZENKOVSKIY
1987
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Perm
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Perm Regional Court
08/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention at the police station on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
57009/21*
19/11/2021
Boris Anatolyevich KURKIN
1990
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
07/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
58200/21*
27/11/2021
Nikita Olegovich SHMATKO
1994
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
03/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
58201/21*
27/11/2021
Marat Ravilevich RYAZAPOV
1974
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Saratov
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Saratov Regional Court
27/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings
58261/21*
27/11/2021
Dilshod Ibragimovich SHARIPOV
1994
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Voronezh
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Voronezh Regional Court
21/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in administrative proceedings
58270/21*
27/11/2021
Vladislav Igorevich DRUGOV
1989
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Vladimir
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Vladimir Regional Court
29/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings
58281/21*
27/11/2021
Aygul Maratovna AMINEVA
1992
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Izhevsk
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Udmurtia Republic
28/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
58295/21*
27/11/2021
Sergey Mikhaylovioch BIZYAYEV
1975
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Perm
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Perm Regional Court
04/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021- Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in administrative proceedings
58300/21*
27/11/2021
Aleksandr Viktorovich ANDREYEV
1989
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City court
24/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based
58303/21*
27/11/2021
Natalya Alekseyevna BOBROVA
1967
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 4,000
Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg
01/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
58308/21*
27/11/2021
Anastasiya Yuryevna GALKINA
1998
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Vladimir
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Vladimir Regional Court
24/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings
59141/21*
27/11/2021
Vladimir Nikolayevich DEMENTYEV
1989
Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Volgograd
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Volgograd Regional Court
10/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy