FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
PILOT-JUDGMENT PROCEDURE
Application no. 34124/04
by Tadeusz ŁOZOWSKI
against Poland
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23 September 2008 as a Chamber composed of:
Nicolas Bratza, President,
Lech Garlicki,
Giovanni Bonello,
Ljiljana Mijović,
David Thór Björgvinsson,
Ján Šikuta,
Päivi Hirvelä, judges,
and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 24 August 2004,
Having regard to the decision to apply the pilot-judgment procedure and to adjourn its consideration of applications deriving from the same systemic problem identified in the case of Broniowski v. Poland (no. 31443/96),
Having regard to the decisions to strike the applications Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (no. 50003/99) and Witkowska-Toboła v. Poland (no. 11208/02) out of the Court's list of cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
THE FACTS
The applicant, Mr Tadeusz Łozowski, is a Polish national who was born in 1939 and lives in Cybinka.
A. Historical background to Bug River cases before the Court
(See E.G. v. Poland, no. 50425/99, §§ 2-5).
B. Particular circumstances of case no. 34124/04
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
On 10 March 1962 the applicant's father acquired State property in compensation for the property abandoned in the territory beyond the Bug River. According to valuation report the value of the acquired property amounted to 42,650 Polish zlotys (PLN) as of 30 August 2003.
On 7 February 1994 the Krosno Odrzańskie District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) gave a decision declaring that the applicant had acquired the entire estate left by his father.
It emerges from the valuation report produced by the applicant that the full value of the original property amounted to PLN 180,300 as of 30 August 2003. According to the relevant valuation reports, the value of the compensatory property exceeded 20% of the value of the original property.
The applicant's subsequent attempts to acquire State property were unsuccessful. The only possibility of enforcing the claim was to participate in competitive bids for the sale of State property. However, the State authorities throughout Poland officially acknowledged the acute shortage of State-owned land designated for the realisation of the Bug River claims.
This fact and the fact that at the material time it was the authorities' common practice to desist from organising auctions for Bug River claimants or to openly deny them the opportunity to enforce their entitlement through the statutory bidding procedure was established by the Court in the Broniowski judgment (see Broniowski, cited above, §§ 48-61, 69-87 and 168-176).
On 31 October 2006 the Lubuski Governor (Wojewoda) issued a decision confirming that the applicant's claim had complied with formal requirements of the Law on the realisation of the right to compensation for property left beyond the present borders of the Polish State (Ustawa o realizacji prawa do rekompensaty z tytułu pozostawienia nieruchomości poza obecnymi granicami państwa polskiego) (“the July 2005 Act”). The applicant was asked to produce a valuation report estimating the value of the original and compensatory property.
C. Relevant domestic law and practice in respect of Bug River claims
(See E.G. v. Poland, no. 50425/99, §§ 16-17).
COMPLAINT
(See E.G. v. Poland, no. 50425/99, § 18).
THE LAW
(See E.G. v. Poland, no. 50425/99, §§ 19-29).
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
1. Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases;
2. Decides to close the pilot-judgment procedure applied in respect of the Bug River applications in the case of Broniowski v. Poland (no. 31443/96).
Lawrence EarlyNicolas Bratza
RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy