.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt }.s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right }.sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }.s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify }.s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt }.s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid }.s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }.sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }.s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid }.s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }
Published on 7 October 2024
FIRST SECTION
Application no. 52066/13
Tamilla MAMMADOVA and Others
against Azerbaijan
lodged on 25 July 2013
communicated on 23 November 2016 and 18 September 2024
The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC under application no. 77919/11 Bagvanov v. Azerbaijan and 31 other applications.
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES
In view of the seizure of the applicants’ case file from Mr I. Aliyev’s office on 8 and 9 August 2014, has the State in the present case hindered the effective exercise of the applicants’ right of application under Article 34 of the Convention?
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy