THIRD SECTION
DECISION
This version was rectified on 26 January 2021
under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court.
Application no. 28567/18
Nikolay Alekseyevich MAMONTOV against Russia
and 7 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 14 May 2020 as a Committee composed of:
Alena Poláčková, President,
Dmitry Dedov,
Gilberto Felici, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.
The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention during transport. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above‑mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.
It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 4 June 2020.[1]
Liv TigerstedtAlena Poláčková
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
(inadequate conditions of detention during transport)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Date of birth
Representative’s name and location
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
28567/18
10/05/2018
Nikolay Alekseyevich MAMONTOV
05/10/1978
Malinin Andrey Anatolyevich
Pechora
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of transport
21/01/2019
02/04/2019
1,000
28889/18
10/05/2018
Yevgeniy Yuryevich KOTRUTSA
26/09/1988
Malinin Andrey Anatolyevich
Pechora
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of transport
21/01/2019
02/04/2019
1,000
30266/18
14/06/2018
Vyacheslav Valeryevich MUTOVKIN
01/01/1982
Vinogradov Aleksandr Vladimirovich
Kostroma
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of transport
21/01/2019
15/03/2019
1,000
30360/18
14/06/2018
Vitaliy Vladimirovich MARKOV
19/06/1976
Vinogradov Aleksandr Vladimirovich
Kostroma
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of transport
21/01/2019
15/03/2019
1,000
30386/18
14/06/2018
Aleksey Nikolayevich AGRANOMOV[2]
04/11/1980
Vinogradov Aleksandr Vladimirovich
Kostroma
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of transport
21/01/2019
15/03/2019
1,000
30650/18
09/06/2018
Pavel Leonidovich GONCHAROV
11/02/1988
Egle Denis Sergeyevich
Krasnoyarsk
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of transport
05/02/2019
24/04/2019
1,000
32363/18
26/06/2018
Sergey Mikhaylovich TUYEV
12/10/1989
Malinin Andrey Anatolyevich
Pechora
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of transport
21/01/2019
02/04/2019
1,000
34397/18
29/06/2018
Petr Andreyevich SELEDTSOV
09/06/1995
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of transport
11/03/2019
03/05/2019
1,000
[1] Paragraph added on 26 January 2021
[2] Rectified on 26 January 2021: the text was: “AGRONOMOV”
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy