FIFTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 24340/12
Roman Leonidovych MOKRENKO
against Ukraine
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 4 November 2014 as a Committee composed of:
Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,
Ganna Yudkivska,
André Potocki, judges,
and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 12 April 2012,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Roman Leonidovych Mokrenko, is a Ukrainian national, who was born in 1970 and lives in Romny.
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention about the length of criminal proceedings and lack of effective remedy in that respect.
On 2 December 2013 and 14 July 2014 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Ukraine in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 2,100 euros to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be free of any taxes that might be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Stephen Phillips Vincent A. De Gaetano
RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy