FIFTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 28024/17
Viktor Oleksandrovych NEKRASOV
against Ukraine
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 28 May 2020 as a Committee composed of:
Lado Chanturia, President,
Ganna Yudkivska,
Anja Seibert-Fohr, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 17 March 2017,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Viktor Oleksandrovych Nekrasov, was born in 1958.
The applicant was represented by Mr S.M. Tykhosha, a lawyer practising in Kherson.
The applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning ineffective investigation into the applicant’s injuries inflicted by private parties were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
By letter dated 13 February 2019, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 13 November 2018 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The delivery slip returned to the Court, indicating that the applicant’s representative received this letter on 26 February 2019.
Still, on 13 May 2019, the Court sent directly to the applicant a similar warning letter, by registered post. However, the delivery slip has not been returned to the Court and no reply has been received to the Registry’s letter.
THE LAW
In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application.
Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 18 June 2020. signature_p_2}
Liv TigerstedtLado Chanturia
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy