Communicated on 13 September 2017 and 18 April 2018
FOURTH SECTION
Application no. 14411/16
Igor OSKIRKO
against Lithuania
lodged on 9 March 2016
The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC.
QUESTIONS
1. Can the applicant still be considered a victim of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention, in view of the decisions by the domestic courts finding violations of his rights in Lukiškės Remand Prison? (see Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania, nos. 40828/12 and 6 others, § 94, 8 December 2015)
2. In the affirmative, has the applicant been subjected to degrading treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention due to the lack of proper partition between the sanitary facilities and the cell in Lukiškės Remand Prison? (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 157, 10 January 2012, and the cases cited therein; Dmitriy Rozhin v. Russia, no. 4265/06, § 53, 23 October 2012; Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia, nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, § 98, 4 October 2016; and Radzhab Magomedov v. Russia, no. 20933/08, § 54, 20 December 2016)
The Government is also requested to provide relevant information about the partition between the sanitary facilities and the cell in Lukiškės Remand Prison concerning the applicant.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy