THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 34916/12
Denis Yevgenyevich PARSHNEV against Russia
and 5 other applications
(see list appended)
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 30 March 2017 as a Committee composed of:
Luis López Guerra, President,
Dmitry Dedov,
Branko Lubarda, judges,
and Karen Reid, Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.
The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention during transport. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.
It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 4 May 2017.
Karen ReidLuis López Guerra
RegistrarPresident
APPENDIX
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant name
Date of birth
Representative name and location
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant
(in euros)[i]
Proposed amount for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant
(in euros)
34916/12
04/05/2012
Denis Yevgenyevich Parshnev
20/08/1986
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law
22/09/2016
07/12/2016
7,125
5,000
37473/15
29/06/2015
Rinat Esetullovich Murtazin
13/06/1985
Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law
22/09/2016
29/11/2016
5,550
6,500
38231/15
13/07/2015
Aleksandr Vladislavovich Bogdanov
17/09/1977
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law
22/09/2016
12/12/2016
1,000
5,000
38260/15
16/07/2015
Yevgeniy Bogdanovich Yuzefovich
27/07/1986
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law
22/09/2016
17/11/2016
1,500
5,000
42875/15
20/07/2015
Ashot Aleksandrovich Andreyev
18/09/1979
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law
22/09/2016
22/11/2016
3,500
5,000
54514/15
12/10/2015
Sergey Anatolyevich Khromenkov
02/05/1987
Makarov Ivan Ivanovich
Syktyvkar
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law
22/09/2016
22/11/2016
3,500
5,000
[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy