Communicated on 4 June 2019
SECOND SECTION
Applications nos. 5131/10 and 25230/14
Nichita IPATE against the Republic of Moldova
lodged on 26 October 2009 and 24 March 2014 respectively
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
Both applications concern the issue of whether the applicant can still claim to be a victim of a breach of Article 8 of the Convention in view of the decisions made by the domestic courts (finding, in the first case, that his correspondence in prison had been censored, and in the second case that he had been unlawfully deprived of the right to have telephone conversations with his mother) and the awards made (equivalent to EUR 119 in both cases).
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES
In each application, has there been a breach of Article 8 of the Convention (as a result of censoring and allegedly destroying the applicant’s correspondence sent from prison, in application no. 5131/10 and of depriving him of the right to have telephone conversations with his mother in application no. 25230/14) (see, for instance, Ciorap v. Moldova, no. 12066/02, §§ 97-104, 19 June 2007)? In particular, in the light of the judgments adopted by the domestic courts and the awards made, can the applicant still claim to be a victim of such a breach?
Applications nos 5131/10 and 25230/14
No.
Firstname LASTNAME
Birth year
Nationality
Place of residence
Representative
1
Nichita IPATE
1971
Moldovan
Bălăbăneşti
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy