Communicated on 28 March 2019
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 28857/14
Pavel RÎBAC and RODINA-AGRO S.A.
against the Republic of Moldova and Russia
lodged on 31 March 2014
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The application concerns the fining of the applicants by the authorities of the self-proclaimed Moldovan Republic of Transdniestria for holding a peaceful assembly.
The applicants claim that their rights guaranteed by Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention were breached.
QUESTIONs tO THE PARTIES
1. Did the applicants come within the jurisdiction of the Republic of Moldova and/or the Russian Federation within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention as interpreted by the Court, inter alia, in the cases of Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII, and Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370/04 and 2 others, §§ 102-23, ECHR 2012 (extracts), on account of the circumstances of the present case?
2. Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention (Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, §§ 85-153, 15 November 2018)?
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy