Information Note on the Court’s case-law 39
February 2002
Ryabykh v. Russia (dec.) - 52854/99
Decision 21.2.2002 [Section I]
Article 6
Civil proceedings
Article 6-1
Access to court
Quashing of final and binding judgment: admissible
Article 1 of Protocol No. 1
Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1
Deprivation of property
Quashing of final judgment ordering return of savings placed in bank: admissible
The applicant instituted civil proceedings against a local branch of the State Savings Bank, the State Savings Bank of Russia itself and the State on the ground that the sum she had deposited in the bank had not been properly reassessed in order to compensate the effects of inflation resulting from economic reforms although such a reassessment was prescribed by law. The District Court found in her favour and awarded her the sum of 129,544,106 roubles, to be paid out of the State Treasury. The judgment became final. Nonetheless, the president of the Regional Court later initiated supervisory review proceedings before the latter court against the final legally binding judgment, which the Regional Court quashed, rejecting the applicant’s claims without hearing her or even informing her that an application for supervisory review had been lodged. The enforcement proceedings were subsequently discontinued.
Admissible under Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
© Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights
This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.
Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy