SECOND SECTION
DECISION
This version was rectified on 5 March 2020
under Rule 81 of Rules of Court.
Application no. 21273/14
S.C. PAN-DORAGRO S.R.L. against the Republic of Moldova
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 30 January 2020 as a Committee composed of:
Ivana Jelić, President,
Arnfinn Bårdsen,
Darian Pavli, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 March 2014,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table.
The applicant was represented by Ms Ctitor, a lawyer practising in Chișinău.
The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning access to court were communicated to the Moldovan Government (“the Government”).
The Court received the friendly-settlement declaration under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against the Republic of Moldova in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay its lawyer[1] the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 20 February 2020.
Liv TigerstedtIvana Jelić
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident
APPENDIX
Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(access to court)
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Date of registration
Representative’s name and location
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application[i]
21273/14
10/03/2014
S.C. PAN-DORAGRO S.R.L.
04/06/2004
Ctitor Natalia
Chisinau
28/03/2018
05/04/2018
10,000 Moldovan lei
[1]1. Rectified on 5 March 2020 : the word “it” has been replaced by “its lawyer”.
[i]. Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy