{"resultcount":79,"results":[{"columns":{"itemid":"001-162878","applicability":"","appno":"43494\/09","article":"8;P1-1;P4-2;P4-2-1;P4-2-3","conclusion":"No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom to choose residence)","decisiondate":"","docname":"CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS - [Dutch Translation] summary by the Dutch Section of the International Commission of Jurists (NJCM)","documentcollectionid":"CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;DUT","documentcollectionid2":"CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;DUT","doctype":"HJUDDUT","externalsources":"","importance":"3","introductiondate":"","issue":"Inner City Problems (Special Measures) Act ; 2003 Housing Bye-law of the municipality of Rotterdam (2006 version)\u000a","judgementdate":"23\/02\/2016 00:00:00","kpthesaurus":"451;369;566;155;270;354","meetingnumber":"","originatingbody":"6","publishedby":"","referencedate":"","kpdate":"2\/23\/2016 12:00:00 AM","reportdate":"","representedby":"WIJLING R.S.","resolutiondate":"","resolutionnumber":"","respondent":"NLD","rulesofcourt":"","separateopinion":"TRUE","scl":"Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Ayangil and Others v. Turkey, no. 33294\/03, § 50, 6 December 2011;Blečić v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 III;Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, § 33, ECHR 2008;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, § 101, ECHR 2014;Codona v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 485\/05, 7 February 2006;Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746\/01, §§ 82-83, 27 May 2004;Guincho v. Portugal, 10 July 1984, § 39, Series A no. 81;Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014\/97, § 166, ECHR 2006 VIII;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 51, Series A no. 98;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, § 70, Series A no. 310;Maurice v. France [GC], no. 11810\/03, § 117, ECHR 2005‑IX;McCann v. the United Kingdom, no. 19009\/04, § 49, ECHR 2008;Mellacher and Others v. Austria, 19 December 1989, § 53, Series A no. 169;Noack and Others v. Germany (dec.), ECHR 2000-VI;O’Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810\/09, § 115, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, § 170, 27 August 2015;Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732\/97, § 48, 24 October 2002;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835\/11, § 129, ECHR 2014 (extracts);S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, ECHR 2011;Salah v. the Netherlands, no. 8196\/02, § 69, ECHR 2006 IX (extracts);Shefer v. Russia (dec.), no. 45175\/04, 13 March 2012;Van Anraat v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65389\/09, § 75, 6 July 2010;Ward v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) no. 31888\/03, 9 November 2004;Winterstein and Others v. France, no. 27013\/07, § 159, 17 October 2013;Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, §§ 112-115, ECHR 2006‑IV;Zehentner v. Austria, no. 20082\/02, §§ 57-58, 16 July 2009","typedescription":"15","ecli":"ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD004349409","casecitation":""}}]}
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy